Orange County NC Website
67XA2 - a© © -2 - c) it <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: May 21, 2002 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. - b <br />SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment: Article 9 Signs <br />DEPARTMENT: Planning & Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) NO <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />Ordinance with proposed text changes p 2 <br />Letter requesting amendment p 7a <br />Permitted Signs: Size, Number, Height <br />and Location of <br />Minutes - Planning Board -April 4, 2002 <br />Minutes - Public Hearing -Feb. 25, 2002 p <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Craig Benedict, Director, Ext. 2592 <br />Robert P. Davis Planner III, Ext. 2580 <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />p 8 Hillsborough <br />732 -8181 <br />P9 Chapel Hill <br />968 -4501 <br />11 Durham <br />688 -7331 <br />Mebane <br />336- 227 -2031 <br />PURPOSE: To close the public hearing, receive recommendations and make a decision on the <br />proposed text amendment to Article 9. Signs of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Petitioner: Pierre Morin, Biltmore Homes, LLC <br />• Proposal is to amend Section 9.6 Signs Not Subject To Permit Requirements <br />• Adds subparagraph I in the unregulated signs portion of the ordinance (Section 9.6) <br />• Current maximum of signs not subject to permit requirements is 4 square feet <br />• This proposal would allow a 16 square foot maximum sign to be installed on the same lot <br />as a builder's model home <br />• Would add a provision that would require a minimum of 12 square feet of landscaping <br />surrounding the sign including bushes or flowers <br />• Sign would limit the information conveyed to: 1) the builder's name, 2) telephone <br />number, 3) the hours that the model is open for viewing, and 4) an e-mail address <br />Process <br />1) Public Hearing held on February 25, 2002 <br />• Voted to send item to Planning Board for recommendation no sooner than May 21, 2002 <br />2) Planning Board unanimously recommended denial of the proposed amendments on April 4, <br />2002 <br />3) BOCC to make final decision. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no public fiscal impact associated with this decision item. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): Administration recommends DENIAL of the amendment. <br />Planning Board recommends DENIAL of the amendment. <br />