Orange County NC Website
~ 4 ~ <br />MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />,. .; BUDGET WORK SESSIONS AND PUBLIC HEARING <br />-.. JUNE, 1988 <br />BUDGET WOR. SESSION ~, JUNE ~ 1988 <br />The Orange County Board of Commissioners met on June 14, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. in the <br />Agriculture Extension Meeting Room for the purpose of holding a budget work session. <br />BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Shirley E. Marshall and Commissioners Moses Carey, <br />Jr., Stephen Halkiotis, John Hartwell and Dan Willhoit. <br />STAFF PRESENT: County Manager John M. Link, Jr., Assistant County Managers William <br />T. Laws and Albert Kittrell, Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe, Data Processing <br />Director Keith Brooks, Deputy Finance Office Ken Chaviaus, Personnel Analyst Darlene <br />Fattish, Furchasing Director Pam Jones, Director of Finance Ellen Liston, Budget Analyst <br />Donna Wagner and Personnel Director Beverly Whitehead. <br />County Manager John Link focused on four areas: <br />(1) Financial pictuxe - what is projected in the fund balance, the review of <br />the CIF and how the County can fund the debt of a bond issue <br />(2) Review the budget document program by program and highlight the major <br />expansion items, personnel and proposed capital increases <br />(3) Department heads or members of advisory boards will make comments <br />(4) Gapital projects, fire districts and compensation package <br />In answer to a question from Commissioner Hartwell, John Link explained how the <br />~: ;concerns at the Cedar Grove Center would be addressed. <br />Ellen Liston gave an overview of the four key components of the budget document <br />9.ncluding (1) education, (2) human service funding, (3) outside agencies and (4) CIP <br />increased funding. <br />The method for calculating fund balance and the appropriation from fund balance <br />were discussed. John Link suggested that the County continue to use appropriations from <br />fund balance in future years for recurring capital needs. This is a variable source of <br />revenue. If this amount is too low, other steps may have to be taken in future years. <br />The Board discussed the methodology to use in future years in determining the fund <br />balance and it was decided to stay with method #2. <br />The Equipment Replacement Fund was discussed. The five year CIP and the two <br />options of (1) bond issue and (2) pay-as-you-go as well as other funding sources were <br />discussed. <br />Ellen Liston went through the revenues and the projections for next year. John <br />Link stated that in looking at the County's financial condition, he is stressing that an <br />eight percent fund balance be maintained in future years. He suggested the following <br />policies be considered: <br />(1) Maintain a minimum of 8$ fund balance <br />(2) Use the appropriated fund balance for capital <br />(3) Use a part of the 1/2 cent sales tax for debt service <br />