Orange County NC Website
-~` _~~ <br />MINUTES <br />ORANGE GOUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND <br />THE PLANNING BOARD <br />JOINT PUBLIC HEARING <br />MARCH 10, 1987 <br />The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in joint session with the <br />Orange County Planning Board on March 10, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. in the Cultural <br />Arts Center, Chapel Hill High School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina for a <br />quarterly joint planning public hearing. <br />BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Shirley E. Marshall and Commissioners <br />Moses Carey, Jr., John Hartwell, Stephen Halkiotis and Don Willhoit. <br />PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Barry Jacobs (Chair), Chris Best, Dan <br />Eddleman, Peter Kramer, Mike Lewis, Betty Margison, Sharlene Pilkey, Brenda <br />Swann, Prince Taylor, Carl Walters, and Steve Yuhasz. <br />A. BOARD COMMENTS <br />Chair Marshall apologized for the notices being sent out late to those <br />citizens who reside in the Rural Buffer area. She stated that notices had <br />been published in the newspapers. <br />B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS <br />.~ 1. MATTERS ON THE PRINTED AGENDA <br />Those who had signed up to speak will be recognized at the <br />appropriate time. <br />2. MATTERS NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA <br />None. <br />PUBLIC CHARGE <br />Chair Marshall read the Public Charge as stated in the agenda. <br />County Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill made reference to the recommendation <br />made in the Rural Buffer Study that would allow property owners of record <br />in the RB to create one lot for each child which would be exempt from the <br />size .requirements o€ the RB zoning classification. He stated that there <br />are also two other amendments that are related to that exemption and they <br />would not be necessary if the Board accepts his recommendation to not <br />permit an exemption for special consideration for children or family <br />members. He continued, stating that, in his opinion, the County would be <br />either without authority to do that or would in other ways violate the laws <br />of the United States and North Carolina. He cited the 14th amendment of <br />the U.S. Constitution which requires equal protection under the laws that <br />regulate land use. The focus of the power of planning enabling legislation <br />is on the use of the property rather than on the ownership. There is no <br />rational basis under the law for distinguishing between owners of property <br />when the use of the property is identical. The North Carolina Constitution <br />has a similar provision -- Article 1, Section 19 says that no person shall <br />be denied equal protection of the laws. Article 1, Section 32 states that <br />no person or set of persons is entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments <br />or privileges from the community but. in consideration of public ser"vice. <br />There is no public service involved which would exempt family members from <br />dimensional requirements of the Ordinance. Therefore, there is a <br />likelihood that any exemption for family members would likewise violate the <br />North Carolina Constitution. The enabling legislation which allows <br />