Minutes - 19840515 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~( 1 I•I INUTES OF2ANGE COUhT1Y BOARD OF CO1v1MISSIONERS P1AY 15 , 19 8 4 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, May 15, 1984 in the courtroom of the Old Post Office Building, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Commissioners Present: Don Willhoit, Chair, and Commissioners Shirley Marshall, Ben Lloyd, Norman tdalker and Richard Whined. A. BOARD COP9P~IF.NTS Chair tillhoit added two (2) items to the agenda: (1) Voting Delegate for the NACq Conference; (2) Proclamation for Svil Stewardship Week. Willhoit announced the cancellation of the May 16, 1984, 8:30 meeting on the Classification and Pay Plan until further information is provided. Commissioner Marshall noted some concerns with the Classification and Pay Plan report as outlined in a memo she distributed and as contained in the agenda file. The pay plan is based upon a classification study that has not yet been made available. Kenneth R. Thompson, County Manager. noted that the report covers all positions in the County and some positions are consolidated under new. titles. Commissioner Whitted suggested scheduling a meeting when all information • was available. $. AUDIENCE ('QM.4FNT5 1, ~_„ttpr~ on he Printed__~,,gend_a - None 2. ~ 'p~~c3 Agenda None C. B,PPOIh'TPI~IQT~ Postponed until the regular meeting in Hillsborough an June 4, 1984. Chair Willhoit noted that the Orange County Democratic party requested that the Board adopt a policy on the length of time a resume would be kept on file. Willhoit made the recommendation to keep all resumes in an active status for one year and then notify accordingly. A11 appointments will be listed on each agenda - the first time for information and the second time for consideration with resumes attached. D. FtEPOF.TS 1~ (see file # ~?'s in the Clerk's files for a copy of this study) Kermit Lloyd, Tax Supervisor reported his findings and gave his recommendation on the Utility Company appeals. Upon examination of the Assessment-Sales Ratio Study from the Assessment Analysis Associates, Inc., there are inc.ications that the entire study is in r~uestion in accordance vrith 27 arms length sales being discarded due to the criteria established by the AAA report as stipulated on pages 25 and 26. When these sales are removed from the sales zatio study a mean ratio of 85.10 is established which is in the required parameters. Also upon investigation of the non arms length sales, 12 were found that did not meet the criteria for non arms length sales and were included back into the sales ratio count which gives a sales ratio of 85.48, which is more than the sales ratio of 85 required by law. G.S. 105.342 states that the level of assessment is measured against all locally appraised property; therefore, personal property should be factored into the level of assessment. By factorinc, the personal property into the level of assessment without tal:incr out anv of the sales but using their 83.423 levels