Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1! b <br />_Tr~T>rrlas <br />OP.At~E COUf~`Y BOAFD OF CQIIIISSTONF~RS <br />FEBRUARY 6, 198 <br />1 <br />The Orange County Eoard of Cormlissioners net in regular session on <br />t•Ionday, February 5, l9°n in the Comcissioners' Room of the Orange County <br />Courthouse, Hillsborough, 2vorth Carolina. <br />Comrissiorers Present: Dor. T^?il]hoit, Chair and Cor~ussioners Ben <br />Lloyd, Shirley Marshall and t7orman C~7alker. <br />- _ - A. f?DAP.D COI ~ L~'xS <br />Comr^.issioner I•?il]hoit (1) deleted from the agenda the minutes of <br />June 21, 1983; (2) announces: receipt .by the County of a dividend on the <br />i•7orlcmen's Compensation Progr~m in the amount of 59,282. D0 to ae added tc <br />the general fund, and (3) introduced a proclamation to proclaim the c-peek <br />o£ February 20-2 as School Safety TsTeek. <br />Commissioner Lloyd moves'„ seconded bs~ Commissioner Marshall to <br />approve and authorize Commission Chair I~illhoit to sign the School Bus <br />Safety Proclamation. VOTE: TJI~II~ITIOCTS. <br />Commissioner ?•?illhait received a r~uest from the 2bvm o` Chapel <br />Hill to delay consideration of two items from the schedule for public <br />' hearing on ?'ebruary 23: (1) Trandescant and (2) major transportation <br />corridor, to enable the 7tx~m to respond after their meeting on February <br />27. He read a resolution from the TJCOG which supports traffic service <br />logo signs or. I-40, and c•~hich resolution will be presented to the TJCOG <br />-- Board on February 10. The resolution emphasized that ne~•~ people coming <br />into an area are mainly concerned wick: the c?uality of life ans. the <br />resolution supported prohibiting billboards and other signs• near the <br />Interstate and endorsed the use of logo signs because (1) minimizes the <br />procedure and (2) aids the traveling public. Commissicner I~allcer felt it <br />inappropriate to endorse the resolution since Orange County is in the <br />process of determining sign reculations for Orange County. Cor~unissioner <br />- Tarshall indicated that the resolution has nothing to do faith the sign <br />ordinance for Orange Co~uzty but only that Orange County would have in <br />motion the concept of logo signs. Cor~anissioner Lloyd opposed eliminatinc <br />all other signs From the roads. <br />Commissioner Parshall moved, seconded by Commissioner ti'illhoit to <br />approve support of the resolution draft from TJCOG. Vp7.'E: AYES, 2; <br />?~~OFS, 2 (Lloyd and F?ali:er). <br />R. ATJDIEPICE C(I-PlET7P5 <br />1. :~?attcrs on t?-ie Printed Arencia <br />hTo Comments <br />2. r. <br />_-.. No Comrents <br />C. ~IIP!CPI'F~~-. <br />Comrtissioner Llcyd r_pved, Commissioner f•9arshall seconded approval of <br />• June 1, 2, E, Septe-~er 20, and October 3, 1983 minutes as circulated. <br />VpPE: T?~?Atil"i8DTT5. <br />D. PUESLIC FT°'~RIPY3 <br />1. Ta n D <br />Planner Susan Sr~ith presented the Preliminary Assessment Roll <br />for Plorthside Drive (SF'. 195) Participatory Paving Project. <br />Comrv.ssicner ~?alY.er moved, Carffrsssioner Lloyd seconded to <br />