Orange County NC Website
APPROVED 6/2/2009 <br /> MINUTES <br /> ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> BUDGET WORK SESSION <br /> March 5, 2009 <br /> 7:00 p.m. <br /> The Orange County Board of Commissioners met for a Budget Work Session on <br /> Thursday, March 5, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. in the Southern Human Services Center in Chapel Hill, <br /> North Carolina. <br /> COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Valerie P. Foushee, Vice-Chair Mike <br /> Nelson and Commissioners Alice Gordon, Pam Hemminger, Barry Jacobs, Bernadette Pelissier, <br /> and Steve Yuhasz <br /> COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: <br /> COUNTY ATTORNEYS PRESENT: <br /> COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Laura Blackmon, Assistant County <br /> Managers Willie Best and Gwen Harvey, and Clerk to the Board Donna S. Baker (All other staff <br /> members will be identified appropriately below) <br /> NOTE: ALL DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THESE MINUTES ARE IN THE PERMANENT <br /> AGENDA FILE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. <br /> 1) FY 2009-10 Budget Update <br /> a) Fiscal Outlook <br /> Laura Blackmon said that this is the first budget work session with department heads <br /> sitting at the table with the Board of County Commissioners to talk about some of the services <br /> that the departments have offered up for discussion. She made reference to the salmon- <br /> colored sheet entitled FY 2009-10 Budget Planning. <br /> Budget Director Donna Coffey updated the Board on revenues. The County department <br /> heads have submitted budget requests. She said that the current year's budget is $183 million. <br /> Of that total, $3.3 million is non—recurring revenue, which means that it will not be available this <br /> year. The $3.3 million is made up of$2 million in appropriated fund balance and $1.3 million in <br /> deferred capital projects. The recurring revenue for the current year is $179.7 million budgeted <br /> and she can depend on $174.3 million for next year. The loss of all of this together is $8.7 <br /> million starting out FY 2009-2010. <br /> She explained why there was such a difference in recurring revenue. She has assumed <br /> the Board's direction that there will be no tax rate increase over the revenue neutral rate. The <br /> natural growth in the real property has averaged 2.8% annually. She said that motor vehicle <br /> valuation is a huge concern. There is an $18 million loss in valuation compared to what was <br /> budgeted. This is in valuation and not in tax dollars. People are not buying new vehicles and <br /> are trading down. The last five months in billings have decreased consistently. She is <br /> assuming that this trend will continue. She estimates a 10% reduction in this revenue. <br />