Browse
Search
P-0185 - Orange County Government Limited English Proficiency Policy 12-11-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Policies
>
P-0185 - Orange County Government Limited English Proficiency Policy 12-11-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2009 9:13:44 AM
Creation date
12/30/2008 4:21:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/11/2001
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County Government <br />• Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Policy <br />(3) The importance of the service provided by the program -Departments should <br />consider the importance of the activity, service, or program and whether the denial or <br />delay of access to service or information will have serious implication for the LEP <br />individuals; and <br />(4) The resources available to the recipient -Department's level of resources can impact <br />the nature of the steps it should take. Smaller departments with fewer resources are <br />not required to provide the same level of resources as the larger departments. Smaller <br />departments should combine their resources to provide meaningful access to LEP <br />populations. <br />1. Language Assistance Principle <br />Assisting LEP individual seeking direct County services or benefits, or where there is potential <br />for the direct imposition of a burden onto the individual by the County: <br />• LEP persons should be advised that they may choose either to secure the assistance of <br />an interpreter of their own choosing, at their own expense, or a County interpreter <br />provided by the relevant Department.3 Documentation that the service was offered <br />and the LEP person's election should be documented in any written record generated <br />with respect to the LEP person. (Achievable immediately. Current practice in <br />• some critical service areas.) <br />• Departments should take reasonable steps to ensure that the interpreter services <br />provided are only through individuals who are competent to provide interpretive <br />services at a level of fluency, comprehension, and confidentiality appropriate to the <br />specific nature, type and purpose of information at issue. (Current practice) <br />• Departments should include, take into account, needed language assistance <br />measures, in addition to those specified in this plan, when changes occur in programs <br />or services where a failure to do so may result in a denial of substantially equal and <br />meaningfully effective services to a significant LEP population served by the County. <br />(Achievable immediately.) <br />• To the maximum extent practical, limited English proficiency shall not act as a barrier <br />or otherwise limit access to vital information, i.e., information publicly available in <br />English as to when, where, or how to access benefits or services from a Department. <br />' A LEP person may often look to a bilingual family member or friend or other person they are comfortable with for <br />language assistance, there may also be situation in which a LEP person may want to rely on County-supplied <br />interpretive services. (Some examples where use of an individual's own interpreter may be justified is when an <br />individual has to reveal or describe information of a sensitive, confidential, or potentially embarrassing nature <br />Similarly, instances where a Department's interest may justify the use of aCounty-supplied interpreter is where <br />precise, complete or accurate translation or information is needed.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.