Orange County NC Website
. "Tool Box" for Providing Services to <br />Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Clients <br />The components listed below are offered as suggested tools that departments may use to <br />accommodate the .needs of non-English or limited-English speaking clients. Approaches may <br />vary depending upon specific departmental needs. <br />1) County Employees. <br />Interpreter services may be provided through County employees as follows: <br />a) Employee whose primary duty is to provide interpreter services. <br />Implementation timetable contingent upon funding of position(s). <br />i) This employee may be hired by a single department or shared among departments <br />who need interpreter services for a major portion of the working day on a daily basis. <br />This type of arrangement would be .recommended primarily for departments who are <br />categorized in the Policy as a provider of "critical services" and by the informs#ion <br />compiled in the departmental surveys, indicated a high need for interpreter services. <br />Departments seeking to add staff for this function would be subject to the new <br />employee approval carried out as part of the annual budget process. <br />b) Limited interpreter services provided by employees on a rotational basis. <br />Implementation achievable within fiscal year 2001-2002. <br />i) Departments with bi-lingual employees, who have demonstrated fluency, may <br />participate in an interpreter pool. <br />• ii) Employees may be scheduled during certain hours of the week to receive calls from <br />any County department needing interpreter assistance. This would be particularly <br />advantageous to departments with infrequent interpreter needs. <br />iii) Call lists could be available on the Intranet so a Department needing interpreter <br />service could easily access help while the caller was on the line. (Achievable within <br />60-days) <br />iv) In order to experience the least amount of disruption in their regular job .duties, <br />employees assigned to offices (as opposed to field personnel) would be most <br />effective in this capacity. <br />2) .Independent contractors. <br />a) Interpreters would be expected to execute a contract with the County prior to being used <br />for interpreter services. (Current practice) <br />b) Interpreters must prove competency to the County's satisfaction prior to being included <br />on the list of available service providers. (Current practice) <br />c) A list of interpreters who may be willing/able to provide interpreter services is centrally <br />maintained. (Currently maintained within departments. Centrally maintained <br />information achievable by end of February. 2002) <br />d) Departments needing interpreter services may. consult the list and schedule the <br />interpreter as needed. <br />