P-0145 - Public Input at Public Hearings 11-04-1985

Browse Search

provisions, The Orange Grove Fire station e~cpansian ooatd be remedied by such an amesdmsnt. bl~ean 9aith referred to the wording of the adverts about the receipt of public eaoma~it, and Geoffrey Gledhill ixdicated that the only ~ that the Board may consider is that which is heard at a public hear and that ac;y written testiirony ~Y not be considered iF there is an .abject on. It wOS decided that the paragraph which refers to the receipt oaf written comaendts be deleted from the advertisement. Board discussion on receipt of public coamexrt~ after the public hearing resulted in a board policy on the subject. ~ '-` -- 05 Motion was made by C7oamissioner Marshall, seoorded by CasR+isosioner ' SCarey to appraro a Board policy r2iat public input on itene that go to public hesrityg will be limited to those received at the public hearing. V~.'E; iA~ldIIKO[16. Motion was made by Camoissianer atarafwl>, saeo~tded by Commissioner Carey to approve the eidvertisement of proposed ~Anitg ordir~anee and subdivision regulations test amts as corrected. WR'8: UI~Il4NIM0[S. 5,~ ~14i~t Mjj MAt1, [Y+t~I+(B ,LFBS~ RF~e Postporad until the rrext meeting. Planning Director Marvin Collins presented for considrxation the P3,anned Special Use Permit application for Chandler's Green. The application was presented at public hearing on June it and Sq~tember 10, 1985. The applicant, Al.leriton Realty, has requested a P7.airied Depe].apn~ent-dousing (PDT) and Res3,detttial 2 (A~-Z) rb~irg d~f9natfon for 80.2 acres out of a 99.44 acre tract located contiguous to the Town of (lapel Hill's northeast corporate boundaries aid situated between Sunrise Road, I-40 acid Weaver . Dairy ~. The Planning Board eorisi,dered the request and reca~Qaeided approve]. with the attaclsnant of 28 conditions. The (9~epe1 Hill ~m Council reoomnerrded approval subject to 22 corditione. The Planning Board in c~r~sidering the request found that it comgiied with Article 8.2.2 og the 8onimg Ordinance in that it was in general eanpliar~ce with the general stardasds, specific rules aid required regulations with the e~ocspti«, of the pravisiar- of sight distance at points of access. the proivision of the 100~oat open space perimeter requirement and the satisfaction of the floor area ratio requirement. They also reoaataerded that the application be approved because they could ffxd nn reason, based on the evidezyce presented at the public hearing, that the use would not promote the public health, safety and general welfare; that it would not mair-tain or e~nhanoe the value of contiguous Property= and that it was not in eonQliance with the general plane of the County. The conditions reoam~ended b+y the Plarmitg Board are similar to those approved by the Chapel Hill. Tbwn Council. (7vllins first reviewed the two changes and additions made by the Ctyapel Hill Tboa~ t7auycil to the original list of conditions submitted by the Chapel A;11 Planning staff. ae then cx;pQared the caonditions as outlined by the Orange County Planning Board with those c~ditione recommaded by the Chapel Hill Tom Qcuncil. Both lists are essentially the ease with the fvllowi,ng e~oceptior~s: (1) Orange Ootufty Platstirg aoard vadition #23 reoa~rde that i.n lieu ~ a 100' buffer strip extending around the entire perimeter o£ the property, that a 30' buffer be provided along the frontage o+f Sunrise Road and a 50' buffer be provided adjac~t to Weaver Dairy Road. Both buffers would be Them of chapel Hill Type 'C'. (2) Orange county Playing Board condition #16 does not require that the proposed recreatia~nl facility ba relocs-ted fray