P-0140 - Special Use Permit Process 09-30-1985

Browse Search

there 3s a surplus of deputies at budget time, the staffing needs would be evaluated at that time. Sheriff Pendergrass wised there is rro danger of overbite because of the turnpver within the department. 1Kotiort was made by Conadssioner Marshall, senortded by Caamissioner Carey to amend the 1985-86 budget as follawaa AppropriatioJrSheriff ~ 60,960 Santos-'t'ransfer frcn Capital Projects Furl ~ 11,500 Source-Transfer from DWI Safe Roads Act S 26,500 Source-Contingency $ 22,960 VOTE ~. - 30 . sf5` T _ ~r.ir l/~ej~ MEl~ffit P~J!t'Ft~t1AKE Pjj' P[ffisTC YL~1Rtlk~6 ~i SPPCTAr. LSf~ Oonmissicner MaxShall requested that newly appointed members be added to the policy. She questioned how a regtirement that an absent Board maaber review all documentary evidence presented and hear all tmti.oronial evidence by listening to the tapes of the Public Bearing could be verified. Catutty Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill indicated that at the time the requirement has beErt met, it could be so doamrertted in the minutes. 8e noted that it is each Board mmbers duty to vote cn raeryPhitrg that comes before the Board in which they don't have a financial interest. The point is that when yet are considering matters for which evid~x:e is taken and sitting in a quasi-judicial cape-city. yen need to kr~aw whnt the evit3enoe is before yvu can take part in the decisiars. 7# you mass part of .the public hearing then it beoame~s a Board policy to ~clude you fsozn voting or establish. a policy by which you become familiar with the item. Notion wee made by Commissioner Carey. seconded by Camnissicner Marshal to adopt the reoo~oorendatioti of the Ooutrty Attorney to 'authorize the Board member to vote oa such an issue with the requirement that the absent Board member review all of the doc~nroentary evidence primed and freer all of the tee*; M+~+; ~ ~ evidence by listening to the tapes of the Public se~arirrg" net the official policy in situations where a member of the Board does net attend a public heariryy. W-PEt iA+PlBID~S. 8 _ ~-1~,_s-Te'a'! SC~oOt. zx~t (Public Hearing to receive the Racaamerdatian from the Planning Board.) Planner Susan Smith presented for decision a request for a Class A bYaecial nee Permit for the snort-residential use of the historic Birgtramo School submitted to public hearing on August Z6, 1985. The Planning Board reooamends approval with the attachmestt of twelve (12) conditions. TfiB PUBi,TC HEE~RING ~3 DBG[,ARBa C[r06t~. lotion was made by Caanissioner Marshall, aeoonded by Ooomtssiorrer Carry that a preponderance of evidence indicates compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the specific use, and that the nee caaplies with all required regulations a~ud standards, that the application should be approved because it is fwirrd that the use will proaote the public health, safety and general welfare if located where propoeaed and developed and operated according to the plan as sutmitteds the use will maintain or enhancQ the value of contiguous propertyt and the use is in oampliance with the general plans for the physical deaelopmExtt of the County as enbodied in theme regulations or in the Coq~rehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the orange County Hoard of CaBaiissiorters and evidenced by the findinges of fact as set forth in Article 8 for SpECial Uses. Attactred to the approval are the following conditions: 1. The grantee of this Special Use Permit shall porn with Orange le~ttery~af credit in an amoantle equal to~they oo~st ~ all public imprav~nt-s plus 108. Tire amcunt shall be determined on the basis of fully eaceatted construction contracts or certification