Orange County NC Website
19 <br /> November and then it would be referred back to the Planning Board and the Board of County <br /> Commissioners in the early part of 2006 for formal review. <br /> The last item on the agenda is concerning rural enterprises and being able to promote <br /> activity in the rural and agricultural areas of the County. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> Allan Rosen said that he has been a resident of Orange County for 13 years. Since <br /> 2001, he has been on the Affordable Housing Advisory Board and he is developing a <br /> conservation neighborhood in Chapel Hill Township. He is speaking on behalf of a local <br /> nonprofit called The Village Project. Eight of the nine board members are residents of Orange <br /> County and they are a group of environmentally minded professionals with design, planning, <br /> and construction expertise. They are very concerned about growth, development, and <br /> environmental protection. He spoke about the process of having the first public hearing of the <br /> land use element in May. He thinks this is premature. He commended the staff for the <br /> outreach meetings. His board prepared two letters, and he distributed them to the County <br /> Commissioners. He said that they prepared this letter to strongly urge the County <br /> Commissioners not to hold the public hearings on the revision of the land use element until a <br /> complete revision is available for public review and comment prior to or coincident with the - <br /> publication of the legal advertisement. He summarized the letter, which follows: <br /> Re: Public Hearings on the Revision of the Land Use Element <br /> Dear Orange County Commissioners Carey, Foushee, Gordon, Halkiotis, and Jacobs: <br /> This letter is to strongly urge you not to hold Public Hearings on the revision of the Land <br /> Use Element until a complete revision is available for public review and comment prior to, or <br /> coincident with, the publication of the Legal Advertisement. <br /> According to tonight's agenda, you will be voting on whether or not to include Orange <br /> County LUE Update Text Amendments as part of the May 23, 2005 Quarterly Public Hearing. <br /> The Action Agenda Item Abstract reads in part, <br /> "Amendments, in the form of a complete re-write and reformatting to the Land Use <br /> Element are proposed. The purpose is to provide a complete update to the Land Use Element <br /> of the County's Comprehensive Plan to address changes that have occurred in the County <br /> since the Land Use Element was originally adopted in 1981 (emphasis added)." <br /> However, rather than presenting a complete re-write or update of the LUE, only two <br /> zoning text amendments are scheduled for public comment. While these amendments <br /> describe two of the five recommendations the planning staff presented in its recent outreach <br /> sessions, we do not feel that consideration of these amendments is warranted absent the <br /> context of the complete re-write or update. To do otherwise would undermine the degree of <br /> time and effort that county citizens and the planning department have put into this multi-year <br /> effort to comprehensively re-assess the existing LUE. <br /> For the past several years the Board of Directors of The Village Project has been <br /> following the initiative to update the Land Use Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Members of our Board attended the May 14, 2003 Joint Boards and Commissions Meeting and <br /> several of the Township meetings in March and April 2004. Additionally, we followed the <br /> County planning department's outreach to several county advisory boards early in 2005 and the <br /> series of community information sessions conducted in March 2005. <br /> Throughout this process the importance and contribution of citizen participation has <br /> been stressed, dating back to the Shaping Orange County Task Force and the Comprehensive <br />