Orange County NC Website
4 <br />Scroggs said that this would provide day-lighting in the entire second floor and some of the first <br />floor. This will reduce the kilowatt usage substantially and make the operating costs go down. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis asked if this was actual physical structure, or electronic devices. Steve <br />Scroggs said that there were sensors that turn lights on and off. There are also solar assisted <br />devices to charge the battery packs for outside lighting and the hot water heater. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis asked about repairs to Rock Haven Road of $240,000. He <br />asked if DOT was willing to do some of these repairs. Steve Scroggs said that because the <br />Town of Carrboro and DOT have not agreed to improvements on Smith Level Road and the <br />Rock Haven Road intersection, the CUP requires that the school system make the repairs to <br />Rock Haven Road. It is not currently aState-maintained road. Commissioner Halkiotis said <br />that this one piece in road improvements is $1 million. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis made reference to Non-Personnel Start-Up-under Bid <br />Package and he asked about the $500,000 for this. Steve Scroggs said that some of this is <br />staff development for new staff, administration hired before the school opens and before the <br />State funding kicks in, and others. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he was worried about what was going to be hit when <br />they start digging on the land. Steve Scroggs said that they have a rock allowance in the <br />contract. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to the possible revised funding stream for High <br />School #3 and asked if the pay-as-you-go cash from impact fees has already been allocated. <br />Steve Scroggs said that the $6.1 million was already encumbered. She asked if the school <br />board had to find another $6.4 million in pay-as-you-go funds because the commissioners were <br />now using impact fees to pay debt service and Steve Scroggs said yes. <br />Rod Visser said that the staff was trying to demonstrate, if the Board had chosen <br />option 2 or 4, what would have been the impact on remaining residual CHCCS pay-as-you-go <br />funds, assuming that they would have to come up with $2.5 million a year in pay-as-you-go <br />money for the next three years to make up for the impact fees earmarked for debt. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked if CHCCS expected to cover $6.4 million and Steve <br />Scroggs said that in their original budget package, they had alternative findings of $11.1 million <br />that was designated for renovations of older facilities and other projects, and they dedicated <br />part of that money to go toward High School #3. <br />Commissioner Gordon verified that CHCCS has to find another $7.5 million for the <br />cost overages, but also another $6.4 million more than they thought. The $6.4 million has to be <br />found from pay-as-you-go funds to replace impact fee money, so the policy that was just <br />passed by the County Commissioners costs them about $800,000 for the first year. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he appreciated all the work that staff and the school <br />board has done. He said that there is a limited amount of money and the interlocal agreement <br />says that, above the money that was allocated, the Board of County Commissioners would not <br />be required to incur debt. Therefore, the County would not grant them the full amount for the <br />cost overages. He agreed with John Link in that they should use the Elementary School #10 <br />planning money for the high school and allocate $4.3 million. He said that this should be <br />thought of as remaining debt capacity. He thinks that there has been a lot of creativity all along <br />and if given an amount, there could be creativity in figuring out how to make it work. He does <br />not think it is his job, as a County Commissioner, to tell the school system which things should <br />be cut. The County Commissioners just allocate the money. <br />Steve Scroggs said that they would like to be creative, and they need to deal with the <br />issue of the alternates. He said that they would like to be provided money to do alternate 1. <br />They do have precedent for using alternates. They do not want to take something out of the <br />building that is going to cost them in the long run for the next 20-30 years. He would rather <br />