Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-11-2008 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 12-11-2008
>
Agenda - 12-11-2008 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2008 3:47:45 PM
Creation date
12/9/2008 3:47:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/11/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081211
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
group that would have a charge and a stable representation that could look at the issues and <br />develop a plan that could then be brought back to this group. Ms. Blackmon stated the proposal <br />was for three task forces, and a membership for those task forces had also been proposed. She <br />said the first task force handled joint planning issues, the second dealt with transportation issues, <br />and the third dealt with water supply and watershed protection issues. <br />Ms. Blackmon stated there had been two recommendations made by staff when the Orange <br />County Commissioners held their discussion: to take the third task force on water supply and <br />watershed protection issues and move the watershed issues into the planning issues; and, the idea <br />that regionally they should move forward with looking at such things as water supply, allocation <br />from Jordan Lake, a new intake facility, conservation issues, or, basically a strategic planning <br />approach to make sure that not only was the water supply there and available but that they had a <br />determined approach to conservation in the way the azea was developing and the one million <br />plus people expected in the Triangle region. <br />Ms. Blackmon stated the County Commissioners had thought that perhaps the Joint Planning <br />Task Force in conjunction with the watershed .and transportation issues might be better <br />approached through a Work Group. She said part of the charge of the Work Group would be to <br />discuss and strategize on possible opportunities and structure for participating jurisdictions to <br />jointly develop and pursue regional initiatives. Ms. Blackmon said there was some discussion on <br />how lazge the Work Group should be, and the proposed representation was listed on the <br />attachment. <br />d) Discussion <br />8:37:43 PM Commissioner Jacobs stated the Durham-Chapel Hill-Orange Work Group met <br />quarterly, and they had discussed whether meeting that seldom would be an effective way to <br />ramp up land use planning and transportation planning. So, he said, there had been some <br />discussion about having two elected officials from each jurisdiction on the Group, then have the <br />Group break into two groups to allow the work to move at a faster pace than the group that just <br />met quarterly. Commissioner Jacobs said spreading out the work load would make it more likely <br />that they would accomplish their goals. <br />Commissioner Gordon stated she was supportive of the work group approach, adding she also <br />supported having two elected officials from each jurisdiction on that work group. She stated <br />meetings could take place more frequently, and suggeted that they have targeted priorities and <br />that the focus be broadened somewhat outside of Orange and Chatham Counties. She also <br />suggested that the Triangle Transit Authority be included in the membership. <br />Alderman Coleman asked had there been less salient issues already identified for each of those <br />nine azeas. Ms. Blackmon said no, that the discussions were broad based. Alderman Coleman <br />asked had there been discussion of a work plan, and what issues that would contain. Ms. <br />Blackmon stated the plan was to prioritize them, noting they could not move forwazd until that <br />was done. Alderman Coleman said his concern was that this Committee was trying to do too <br />much, and the result of that would be that the Committee's membership would not be effective. <br />He stated it would be unlikely that the Committee would make progress on more than a few of <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.