Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-24-2008 - c4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 11-24-2008
>
Agenda - 11-24-2008 - c4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:48:02 AM
Creation date
12/2/2008 12:46:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081124 - QPH
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
RES-2008-087 Resolution Approving Ord Zoning Atlas Amendment Rezoning Petition Vernon Davis
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2008
RES-2008-088 Resolution to Deny an Ord Zoning Atlas Amendment Rezoning Petition Vernon Davis
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />The Rezoning of 4.67 acres at White Cross to "AS" <br />Reasons To Rezone: <br />1. It enriches the applicant. <br />Reasons Not to Rezone: <br />1. This rezoning is not supported by the Orange County Zoning Ordinance: It circumvents the <br />reasoning for limiting commercial development in Rural Activity Nodes. <br />2. This rezoning is not supported by the Orange County Land Use Plan for Bingham Township, <br />3. Approval will create a public health hazard for everyone who travels these roads, to make this <br />worse, approval under the "Agricultural Services Loophole" does not even require CUPS, or <br />traffic impact studies. <br />4. There is an existing zoning violation on the subject property. This should be cleared up by the <br />applicant before it becomes more complicated. <br />5. Approval is not in keeping with desires to preserve the rural character of the White Cross <br />Community. <br />6. The applicant can already use the property for residential or agricultural purposes. It was <br />purchased under this zoning in February 1994. <br />7. There is great opposition from residents of White Cross. <br />8. This application process should be stopped because this process is technically flawed. Only <br />two property owners were notified of this rezoning request. It is therefore qustionable whether <br />it is within the law to proceed with this application. Proper notice has not been given as required <br />under the rules for rezoning applications. <br />9. People have worked very hard to create a nice community, the proposed uses would be a blight <br />on the community and bring in many problems that are not in keeping with this community. <br />10. County commisioners; have asked that the definition and uses of "AS" districts be reviewed. <br />This application should not be considered until this clarification is made. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.