Agenda - 11-24-2008 - c4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

.19 Rene Price, Planning Board member, asked about the existing use of the property. 2 that the total tract consists of approximately 10 acres. There is a 3 Mary Willis indicated which is not being proposed for rezoning. There is 4 residence on the southern most portion is an antique store with a zoning portion being proposed for the rezoning. There 5 nothing on the to 6 of NC-2 on the corner. 7 a by Corpj�jsslonerGordon, seconded by commissioner Crowther, to A motion was mad( an 9 refer this item to the Planning Board for a_Eec �6mmendatjpn to be returned no sooner than lo anuary 11 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 12 13 A motion was made by commissioner Gordon, seconded by commissioner Crowther to Board and the Board of Health the problem of the septic system being 14 refer to the Planning Boa endation to be returned to the Board of 15' located in the wrong zoning district for a recomm 16 commissioners. 17 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 18 e by Commissioner Gordon, theo nde d iher, to 19 * A motion was mad uest that they review permitted uses for Agricultural 20 refer to the Planning Board a req W_8�u�ibe a �cha�ige� . c- 'JC� 21 Services DI Ict and recommend if there s 22 VOTE: UNANIMOUS UNA 8 9�Lnes Concrete 24 (b) Z-s-96 Jones Concrete (�AR to EC-5) �b _ _� , . �"O' " W1 s 26 This item was Presented by Planner Mary VVIIIIS to receive citizen comment on d by the Orange County PlanniErnes Janes ,26 a Zoning Atlas Amendment request submitte ried by Henry n - a The Planning Staff requests-the rezoning.-of a4.54-acre lot OW 27 sethe Prpp sed cialr 28 5908 NC 86 North also known as lot No 2.33-5. The premi The reuest is to ne rty f rom AR to EC-5 to 29 Jones Concrete. Service..sincej QQ9-... - . _1 e Township.. The Administration .30. correct.an oversight d.uring-the.original zoning of . Cedar Grov recommendda a ed onttbe eferred the Planning Board for 32 a recommeion to be returned no sooner than January 16, 1996. 33 --34.-.___QU COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. .F,�1ONS AND/OR 35 None. 36 37 QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD. 38 None.. 39 COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS. 40 QUESTIONS AND/OR . , spoke.in support of this request. He 41 Mark Sheridan, attorney for Henry,Jones h usiness fpracessarMr 42 mentioned that Mr. Jones -has been in the concrete serv1ce 43 Ms. Willis for her candor in acknowledging the oversight in e zoning . Jone s was 44 denied a request for a permit to rebuild a structure damaged by fire. He was told that he did 45 not have the proper zoning. At that time the Planning Department filed the application on Mr.