Orange County NC Website
14 <br />~~ <br />r <br />1 Commissioner Carey asked Geof Gledhill to repeat this. <br />2 Geof Gledhill: On page 35, condition #10, on the last line, it says, "keep their guests <br />3 from parking on neighboring roads or on neighbors' property." I would want you to ask the staff <br />4 to name those neighboring roads. <br />5 Chair Jacobs: We'll get to the specifics of the recommendation. <br />6 Commissioner Gordon: In terms of the action to #3 in the Manager's <br />7 recommendation, the first part, "Take action to approve the application, and impose 15 <br />8 recommended conditions.....and the Resolution of Approval." But it isn't laid out exactly that <br />9 way in any one document. I would have accepted a Resolution of Approval that you have listed <br />10 with the conditions somehow in. I would need to understand that if it is a Resolution of Approval <br />11 that you are moving the Resolution near the end, plus the recommended conditions. <br />12 Chair Jacobs: Commissioner Gordon is essentially questioning the way in which it was <br />13 presented, I had the same reaction. <br />14 Commissioner Gordon: I would have thought that there would have been a resolution <br />15 that listed all of the conditions. <br />16 Geof Gledhill: I would recommend two things about the Resolution of Approval when <br />17 you get to it. One of them is that you incorporate the conditions into the Resolution of Approval, <br />18 and the second is that the Now, Therefore Be it Resolved language in the first resolution be <br />19 changed from "is denied" to "is approved." <br />20 <br />21 A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br />22 Foushee to close the public hearing according to the worksheet provided in Attachment <br />23 2. <br />24 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />25 <br />26 Geof Gledhill: I think the Now, Therefore Be it Resolved would be, and I'm looking at <br />27 the Resolution of Approval, the resolution should say, "The special use permit is approved <br />28 subject to the recommended conditions of approval. You can refer to the page in the abstract <br />29 for that. <br />30 Chair Jacobs: Do we want to talk about the recommendation for the items on 35 and <br />31 36? The Attorney suggests specificity regarding neighboring roads, which I assume are Terry <br />32 Road, New Sharon Church Road, and St. Mary's Road. <br />33 Geof Gledhill: My preference would be not to include any future roads yet to be built or <br />34 named. <br />35 Commissioner Gordon: I guess the other thing is, I don't know exactly how the 15 <br />36 conditions relate to the findings. <br />37 Geof Gledhill: How many of the conditions are necessary in order to make positive <br />38 findings, I think the staff can answer that. <br />39 Chair Jacobs: It would seem that we probably should approve or address the findings <br />40 of fact because the conditions relate to the findings of fact. If someone wants to address a <br />41 specific finding of fact, we could do that, or if you want to address the findings of fact in total, <br />42 we could do that. There was a question about which of the conditions address necessary <br />43 findings. <br />44 <br />45 Michael Harvey went through each condition on page 35: <br />46 1. There is a condition addressing a requirement for all special use permits that will be <br />47 mitigated as best they can. Specifically, under #1, we're requiring a 30-foot buffer to try to <br />48 eliminate the off-site impacts, the visual obstructions, we've recommended that condition be <br />49 adopted in terms of adhering to one of the findings as part of the special use permit. <br />