Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 4a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 4a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2008 4:43:38 PM
Creation date
12/1/2008 4:42:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081201
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br />;u <br />1 <br />2 5. Public Hearings <br />3 <br />4 a. Review of Class A Special Use Permit Proposing the Development of a <br />5 Montessori School <br />6 The Board considered receiving final. requested information and taking action on a Class <br />7 A Special Use Permit application proposing the development of a private school at 711 Terry <br />8 Road (SR 1573). - <br />9 <br />10 Michael Harvey: This item originally began when you reviewed the application <br />11 September 16, 2008 at a County Commissioners' meeting where staff was asked to provide two <br />12 additional pieces of information. Specifically, we were asked to get the final definitive statement <br />13 from the Fire Marshal indicating whether the proposed fire access roads around the school <br />14 buildings had to be paved and two, if the Caldwell Fire Department could provide fire protection <br />15 services to the facility. We have gotten those answers for you, they are in attachments 3 and 4 <br />16 respectively. You will note from the abstract that the Fire Marshal has indicated that State fire <br />17 codes do not require a paved fire lane, but the fire lane must be approved to, and I quote, <br />18 "Support the imposed loads of fire apparatus, and shall be surfaced so as to provide all weather <br />19 driving capabilities." Secondly, we have a letter from the Caldwell Fire Department indicating <br />20 that they can provide fire service with a stipulation that the applicant provide an alternative water <br />21 source, specifically a 30,000 gallon water source somewhere on the property in order to provide <br />22 fire suppression services. As we informed the Board at the last meeting, we have a condition <br />23 specifically, I believe it's number 2 (page 35), that indicates that if the SUP is approved that a <br />24 condition be placed on the SUP that the Fire Marshal and representatives of the Caldwell Fire <br />25 Department shall review and approve the revised site plan prior to the approval of any building <br />26 and zoning compliance permit, approving the location of all proposed improved fire lanes and <br />27 stacking areas, verifying that they comply with all applicable North Carolina Fire Protection <br />28 Code standards, and approve the development, size, and use of the pond as an emergency <br />29 water source for fire suppression activities prior to the start of land-disturbing activities on the <br />30 property. I believe that this condition addresses and incorporates the suggestions and <br />31 comments of both the Fire Marshal and the Caldwell Volunteer Fire Department, in terms of <br />32 ensuring that fire suppression services be received on the property. <br />33 With that, you have before you a recommendation from the Administration that you <br />34 receive these memorandums and impose any additional questions that you would like, that the <br />35 public hearing then be closed and that the deliberations begin on the application as presented <br />36 to you this evening. <br />37 <br />38 Geof Gledhill: After you close the public hearing, you should expressly make findings <br />39 either positively or negatively. If the Board is comfortable with all of the findings, you can do it <br />40 all at once or single out. This is beginning on page 5 through page 34. Just a note about that, <br />41 the resolution approval captures what actually is the case with respect to.the finding on Article <br />42 8.2.1, which is on page 34 about formal evidence. What this document says is, "No formal <br />43 evidence was presented to the Planning Board refuting Mr. Knight's findings." There was in fact <br />44 evidence submitted as part of the public.hearing refuting Mr. Knight's findings, so I'd cross that <br />45 off before making the finding. The Administration recommendation is that you find that Mr. <br />46 Knight's findings controlled the issue. If you should agree with his findings rather than the other <br />47 findings, but there was evidence submitted refuting his findings. <br />48 The only other thing that I would add would be recommended condition #10, neighboring <br />49 roads, if the Planning staff would make that more specific, then I think I would feel more <br />50 comfortable and perhaps they could make that more specific right now. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.