Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 3d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 3d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:50:27 AM
Creation date
12/1/2008 4:37:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081201
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5' Materials Revenues. Ferrous metals can be recovered from the bottom ash <br />adLhat2 perc�ntofth� <br />and sold as scrap on the open market. It was assurn <br />incoming waste or 1,752 tons per year would be recovered and sold at a <br />current phoa of $80.00 per ton' It was assumed that the plant operator <br />would receive 50 percent of the sales as an incentive payment, a standard <br />industry practice. <br />6. Operating Costs. A cost of $57.00 per ton processed was assumed for the <br />5.1.3 Pro Forma Operating Statement <br />Based on the assumptions above, the annual Operating Statement of the system <br />would be as presented in Table 5-1' <br />Table 5-1. Pro Forma Annual Operating Statement <br />Revenues <br />Electricity $1/839,500 <br />Ferrous Recovery $140,160 <br />Total Revenues $1,979,760 <br />Costs <br />operating &Maintenance <br />Ash Disposal <br />ByPaseDispoaa| <br />Annual Debt Service <br />Operator Revenue Sharing <br />Total Costs <br />$4,993,200 <br />$1,095,000 <br />¢66O,UOO <br />$3,991,076 <br />¢183,96O <br />$10,923,236 <br />Net Cost ¢8,943/476 <br />Net Cost/Ton $102.09 <br />The ash produced bv the facility would need to be transferred and b*ndfUed' The <br />estimated cost for this is projected at$5O per ton in Table 5-1. <br />The cost per ton is quite sensitive to the price of electricity. For example, if it could <br />be assumed that electricity could be sold for $0.09 per kilowatt-.hour instead of $0.06 <br />per kilowatt-hour, the net disposal cost of approximately $102 per ton would be <br />reduced to$89 per ton, an approximate 13 percent reduction incost. <br />5.2 Effectiveness of Waste Processing Technologies <br />Since any VVPT will have some residual in need of disposal, when discussing <br />effectiveness of VVPT, emphasis is placed on obtaining the least amount of residual <br />material for final disposal. While combustion technologies significantly reduce the <br />volume of material destined for landfills, the resulting ash must be managed. Typical <br />management methods include disposal in a Subtitle D landfill or beneficial use in <br />construction projects and alternative daily cover for landfill wastes. In Europe, <br />where land for |andM|\ing is scarce and several countries have banned landfills, the <br />' 25 August 2008 <br />G8B/CO8O��-01 , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.