Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 3d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 3d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:50:27 AM
Creation date
12/1/2008 4:37:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081201
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Authority. While the RFPvvas open to all interested and qualified vendors, only those <br />technologies deemed qualified by the Authority were eligible for consideration. <br />The Authority was directed to obtain proposals for expanding the current VVTE <br />capacity in two ways: /1l additional capacity at current meet Harfond <br />County's needs, but not <br />provide significant additional energy to the Aberdeen Pr <br />oxing <br />Ground (APG), and (2) build a new RRFto accommodate the waste disposal needs of <br />Ha rford County, including capacity for some of the waste disposal needs of adjacent <br />"Base Realignment and Closure Act" (BRAC affected counties (Baltimore and Cecil <br />Counties), and provide a greater amount of the energy needs ofAPG. APG had <br />agreed -' to |eaee an additional 20 acres of land next tothe existing FlRF for the larger <br />regional facility. <br />The Authority has short-listed both Oovanta Energy and Wheelabrator Technologies <br />proposals as responsive and will continue the procurement process with those finns' <br />The Authority is currently seeking approval from Harford County to begin formal <br />negotiations with the vendors to arrive at a final contract to be voted on by the <br />Harfnrd County Council. Best and final offers have been requested from both <br />companies and should be received by the end of September 2008, followed by final <br />selection and negotiations. <br />4.2~3 City of Sacramento, CA <br />In August 2007, the City of Sacramento, CA issued an RFQ soliciting an experienced <br />and qualified finn to partner with it to process MSVV utilizing alternative technologies <br />premised on resource recovery and/or energy creation. To qualify, firms must have <br />had demonstrated experience and capacity to finance, design, build, own and <br />operate a facility that processed MSVV in excess of what the City currently disposes <br />of, approximately 2,300 TPD after diversion. Sacramento was interested in e facility <br />that used treatment technologies including, but not limited to, pyrolysis, gasification, <br />advanced thermal recycling (a second generation advancement of mass-burn <br />~ <br />techno|ogies�, biological, chemical, physical and/or a combination thereof. They <br />wanted technologies that were well proven at commercial scale, had high landfill <br />diversion rates, and could generate a wide range of useful by-products that could be <br />marketed for revenue sharing by the City and its development partner. <br />In October 2007, the City received 11responses to the RFQ, not all of them waste <br />processing technologies. The City performed a technical evaluation of the responses <br />and went to the Council to request an Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement <br />(EN�A\ with a single company, U.S. Science and Technology. A plasma arc <br />^ ^ <br />gasification project is being evaluated vv i | ted ithdue diligence expected to be completed in <br />� <br />early September. City officials traveled to Japan to visit a plant that employs a <br />similar technology at a oonnnlencia| level (Westinghouse Plasma Corporation). A <br />decision on the implementation of the project is expected in the near term. <br />4.2.4 Broward County, FL <br />The Bmwand County Solid Waste Disposal District ( in July 2007 was <br />considering changes to its solid waste management infrastructure in the near term. <br />Because its disposal contracts with two privately-owned VVTEfacj|ities will reach the <br />end of their initial service agreement terms in the near future, the District recognized <br />that many options to be considered would require significant development time, and <br />thus began the process to proactively evaluate such options. The District sought, <br />through a Request for Expressions of Interest (RFEI), to identify firms that could <br />GBB/C08027-01 19 August 15,2OO8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.