Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 4g - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

G d� Cabe Crossing (formerly Bramco Partners) Subdivision --Preliminary Pla Affach0eUtG The Board c(insidered taking action on the Cabe Crossing Subdivision Preliminary Plat. Glen Bowles said that the Planning Board on June 6, 2007 approved this as a 334ot subdivision. Now it is coming back as a 204ot subdiviislon. This is off of Cabe Ford Road just west of Pleasant Green Road. The pwoperty is zoned Agricultural Residential and Is in the Lower Eno Protected Watershed. The average lot size |m2'2acres, There xa also mwildlife corridor. He showed some pictures ofthe property. He read theAdministnat|#n Recommendation. Commissioner Gordon asked about the Planning Board recommendation, which was to delete the otub-ou#o' The recommendation |oto keep them. She asked for the pros and cons on this. - Glen Bowles said that the stub-outs allow connectiV4 into and out of the property. The pros for taking them out are that the neighbors did not see a need for them. Commissioner Gordon asked about the reasons given bv the one person ofthe Planning Board that voted against this development and Glen Bowles ' said it was because oftoo many-lots. � [�orD[n|ooionerC$ordbn asked several other clarifying questions that were answered hx Glen Bowles. ' Chair Jacobs asked about the Homeowners Association and Geof Gledhill said that the documents suggest this. Some pf the property is dedicated to the Homeowners Association for private recreation.. The pu��|onaorma�oDarea naquinaOlertiabe�OQmo�s�edb* the ��ounb/ taMMgtd|ein�i;�ly�ndthen ultimately it becoming part of the State park mf that 4k7J-s.creparcel. Chair Jacobs said that the Board asked the Attorney to work on the Homeowners Association agreement aothat it does not preclude th d use of clotheslines mr the requirement forxmatepintenoive|uvvna.oranymthernaedhodonsthatooanctnrnmrtQnzmdh. Qeoy Gledhill said that ha presumes the developer would agree tnthis. K8cPe|oquiM said yes. ' Commissioner Gordon asked how the two items that came in afterwards regarding three archeological sites and historic preservation would behandled. Goof Gledhill said thet the state Department of Cultural Resources requirements, page 2, says, "if |tia subject to Section 106...." He said that this \ u| to issue that is beyond the County's area ofconcern. }f the National Historic Preservation Act gives this state agency regulatory authority, then that authority will be exercised. The slave cemetery is on the property and the others are not. Craig Benedict said that there is only one property that involves cemetery within this development. This would b part of lands that are programmed hm go back td the Ghateand the State can do whatever itVvohfo' There are not any Army Corps of Engineer permits, which would activate this review process bv the Division nf Cultural Resources. There iea better level of review than what io within the regulations. ' ' Chair Jacobs made reference tom statement from the letter from Ms. Hall from Cultural Resources, and read, 1 do not believe that the subdivision property has ever been examined for archaeological oltmm'" Craig Benedict said that if there was o special use permit, thmna'mre additional review and activities that occur With that type of subdivision. This was more ofa preliminary review cf identifying sites. .[3eof Gledhill recommended some minor changes |nthe conditions. On page B` condition B7, the second line should read, "provide fundo." instead of "shelf baposted toensure that the applicant will oov," The e$condehmngm was uncond0on Bb, and the third line should read, "directing that" instead ofutoeneuna." A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the Administration recommendation, which is approval of the Preliminary Plat in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval and subject following: - The $9,1OOin-U -of parkland dad|oeOoh fee be waived, and - The "stub ouf'etnaet shall be included mn the Preliminary Plat. And that the County accept the offer of dedication of the 4.73-mnne Tract "A"baaccepted as public recreation land, and authorize the Chair to execute such deeds and other documents as deemed necessary by the County Attorney iD order to convey Tract "Kbm the Eno River Association for ultimate conveyance to the State of North Carolina for inclusion in the Eno River 'State Park. The motion includes the changes as submitted by the County Attorney and the comments about the homeowners association. VOTE: UNANIMOUS