Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 4g
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 4g
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:52:31 AM
Creation date
12/1/2008 4:33:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4g
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081201
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Glenn Bowles: There is an agreement between the Eno River Association and the owners of the property <br />that land will be donated to the Eno River Association. That deal has not happened and will in October. <br />Michelle Kempinski: Is that the 4.1 acre parcel that Rich referred to in his memo. <br />Jay Bryan: You don't mention that in our recommendations. <br />Glenn Bowles: That is not part of the subdivision although it was part of the concept plan. <br />Judith Wegner. We are sure. that will happen. <br />Glenn Bowles: It is their intent. <br />Judith Wegner. The issue about the recommendations about in lieu versus to dedicate, could you speak to <br />that. The memo sounded as if the recommendation to do in lieu came in afterwards. <br />Glenn Bowles: The recommendation you saw in the report from the Parks Department, this particular <br />dedication wasn't described at the time and therefore when they made their recommendation, it was made <br />in lieu of fee. <br />Judith Wegner. I assume you talked to them and have they changed their mind or they saying they think <br />this is a remote piece of property they can go to <br />Glenn Bowles: I think the question is does this group think it is appropriate be dedicated as public <br />recreational land not. The amea s this icould the parks people was <br />it could be dedicatedeto some entity other <br />eventually to a state to agency which <br />than the county. <br />Jay Bryan: We need to move along. <br />Glenn Bowles: We think because this meets the subdivision and zoning regulations and is compatible with <br />the Comprehensive Plan, the recommendation should be in the affirmative. <br />Jay Bryan: Your recommendation begins on page 231. <br />Glenn Bowles: It starts on page 241 and goes through page 246. <br />Renee Price: Historic sites? <br />Glenn Bowles: There is a slave cemetery on the 4.7 acre parcel that we would like to have dedicated as <br />public recreation space. <br />Renee Price: Has any other archeology been done on the site. <br />Jeff Peloquin (Representative for Applicant for Cabe Crossing: That particular parcel has old burial sites <br />with foot stones. It represents 4 acres with steep topography and mature trees. Originally we were going to <br />use part of it but we decided not to. Originally we presented this to the Board and it was approved for 33 <br />lots. Since that time, it also incorporated the area along the river which was a primary wildlife corridor. In <br />working the plan, there are more elements involved. Basically, the primary element was that we had the <br />property up here and the Eno River Association very anxiously was trying to purchase as much land as they <br />could. In going through the process with the state, we managed to and they wanted to have it so <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.