Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 4g
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008
>
Agenda - 12-01-2008 - 4g
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:52:31 AM
Creation date
12/1/2008 4:33:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4g
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081201
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dwellings Without county, North Carolina <br />Description <br />~ ^^ ^ <br />of three h��a <br />uvmx/mga�=^"'y"=='v — -''-- <br />basements, the foundation is assumed vn consist w spread footings of reinforced <br />ed <br />concrete built on undisturbed soil sda depth of2feet or the depth of maximum <br />frost penetration, whichever is deeper. <br />The ratings for dwellings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of <br />the, soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect <br />excavation and construction costs, The properties that affect the load-supporting <br />capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear <br />extensibility (shrink-swell potential), and compressibility. Compressibility is inferred <br />from the Unified classification of the soil. The properties that affect the ease and <br />amount of excavation include d * epth to a water table, ponding, flooding, slope, depth <br />to bedrock or a cemented pant hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, and the <br />amount and size of rock fragments. <br />The ratings ar ebothvorbsJondp <br />numerical, Rating class terms )n <br />indicate the eextent <br />to which the soils are limited bv all of the soil features that affect the specified use. <br />"Not limited" indicates that the :soil has features that are very favorable for the <br />specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can beexpected. <br />"Somewhat limited" indicates that the soil has features that are moderately <br />favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by <br />special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate <br />maintenance can bo expected. `very |hn�o- '� di �=" thatth ~. d|haooneormopa <br />use. The �o�n���are un��n�|a$��ampao�eo . <br />be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, orexpensive <br />installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be ex <br />pectod' <br />Numerical ,atngeindiu�etheeswo�yof|ndkiduo||im8odonm. The n�|nQoare <br />' <br />shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They Indicate gradations <br />between the point e1 which n soil feature has the greatest negative impact onthe <br />use (1.O[) and the point ai which 'the soil feature ie not m limitation (O.00)' <br />Rating Options <br />Aggregation Method, Dominant Condition <br />Component Percent Cutoff., None Specified <br />Tie-break Rule:Highe <br />"SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2-0 Page 4 of 4 <br />Conservation Service National Cooperative Sell Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.