Browse
Search
Minutes - 20081021 - Transfer Station
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Minutes - 20081021 - Transfer Station
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 3:43:20 PM
Creation date
11/19/2008 12:09:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/2008
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 1 early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 4 early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 5 early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 5a early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 6 early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 7 early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 8 early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 9a early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 9b early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda - 10-21-2008 late
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda -10-21-2008 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
Agenda 10-21-2008 - early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 10-21-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•Presence of Natural Buffers <br /> •On-Site Wooded, Topographic Relief or Other Features <br /> •Impacts on Existing Businesses <br /> •Buffer Zones and Screening Measures <br /> •Off-Site Wooded, Topographic Relief, or Other Features <br /> •Traffic Compatibility <br /> •Street or Roadway Connector Access to Major Arterials and Highways <br /> •Proximity to Bike Routes, Schools, etc. <br /> •Impact on Historic or Cultural Features <br /> •Number of Features within 1000 Feet of Site <br /> •Cost Consideration <br /> •Site Development Costs <br /> •Assessed Tax Value <br /> Community-Specific <br /> Site Evaluation Summary <br /> Community-Specific Site Evaluation Summary <br /> Technical Site <br /> Evaluation Summary <br /> Technical & Community-Specific Site Evaluation Summaries <br /> 3. Discuss Results of Technical Criteria along side Results of Community-Specific <br /> Criteria <br /> Bob Sallach reiterated that the rank is simply the numeric point total and does not <br /> represent the recommendation to the Board or the Board's desire. The highest ranked site is <br /> #759. He said that there is a significant break after the sixth site in terms of total points. <br /> He went through the Technical and Community-Specific Evaluation Summaries, which <br /> showed the ranking of the sites based on both sets of criteria. For example, site 857 had a <br /> technical criteria ranking of 1 but a community-specific criteria ranking of 6. <br /> He said that this is presented to the Board for further consideration. <br /> Chair Jacobs said that Commissioner Carey could not be here and is en route from the <br /> airport and may be here later. He said that the Board of County Commissioners at its meeting <br /> last week established that it did not want to have more than three candidate sites. <br /> Commissioner Foushee pointed out that the Board did not officially decide on three sites, <br /> but there was a general consensus. <br /> Bob Sallach pointed out that in this consideration, there is one site that is freely offered for <br /> sale, and this is site 056. <br /> Commissioner Foushee made reference to the number of sites off of NC 54 and if anyone <br /> has measured the distance from these sites to the 1-40/1-85 connector. Bob Sallach said that <br /> they have looked at distances and travel time from the centroid of waste generation to the site, <br /> but not to the station itself. He said that the travel pattern from the transfer station will be <br /> somewhat dictated on where ultimate disposal is. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.