Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
May 6, 2008 Draft Comprehensive Plan <br />Table of BOCC Accepted Planning Board Revisions <br />(Line items revised by the BOCC have been noted where applicable) <br /> m <br />~ Q <br />c ~ <br /> PB Proposed Revision ° w ~ ~ <br /> (Chapter breaks and new objectives are shaded) ~ op ~ ~ ~ <br /> main a~ <br /> <br />~ ~ c 'LOS too <br />_ a ~ Oma om <br /> <br /> In FY 2006, Orange County experienced $7, 440 in peF <br />7) 3-10 48 sap+ta retail sales per capita '?mnng rni~n+i°~ in +"° ~°n°.,rnh Tri.+n..l° <br />+~• BOCC 9/10/2008 <br />8 3-10 Fi 3-8 Delete Person Count from table. BOCC 7/9/2008 <br /> Looking at 2002 Census of Agriculture data, Orange County had fewer <br />9) 3-11 8 farms than most other counties in the Q°°°'r^" Tri.,n^~° region (Alamance, Staff 7/9/2008 <br /> Chatham, Durham and Wake Counties). <br /> <br />10) <br />3-13 <br />47 "...lar <br />gely due to the wages earned from employers located in the Research <br /> g <br />Trian le Park and Duke University." PB 7/9/2008 <br /> Insert: Orange County is distinctive in that a substantial proportion of its <br /> citizens work in the Research Triangle Durham and Duke University but <br />11) 3-16 14 prefer to live in the County because of the high quality of life These <br /> <br />residents typically earn above average incomes and make below average pg 9/3/2008 <br /> demands on public services. Public policies designed to increase iobs within <br /> Orange County should not reduce this appeal to commuters. <br />12) 3-16 21 What's in store for the next 50-20 years? Staff 7/9/2008 <br />J <br />11/18/08 All comments from the May and August Public Hearings were considered by the Planning Board during its review process. 3 of 32 <br />