Orange County NC Website
where the bulk of the lateral groundwater flow in Piedmont surficial aquifers is known to occur. <br />Wells screened within this horizon of high fracture density and of high local fracture connectivity <br />will have "fast" near -field responses, resulting in slug test overestimates of bulk hydraulic <br />conductivity. Measurements obtained from core at the Guess Road Site indicate fracture densities at <br />least an order of magnitude greater than those reported by Dr. Kabala for the Duke Gate 11 site. <br />JEI and the NC Solid Waste Section are well aware of the limitations associated with applying <br />porous media concepts to fractured bedrock aquifers. The approximations arrived at on the basis of <br />a porous media approach are justifiable partly on the basis of the high fracture densities in the lower <br />parts of the weathering profile beneath the site, and in the upper parts of bedrock. Use of these <br />approximate methods are also justifiable on the basis of the low environmental risk associated with <br />C &D waste. <br />• Questions about the accuracy of the 1% effective porosity estimate used for our calculations are <br />moot, as the magnitude of this value is critical only for calculations applicable to the porous media <br />approach. <br />• The uppermost parts of regolith referred to on page 18 of the Site Application are composed of <br />completely weathered predominantly silty material, and can indeed be expected to act in an isotropic <br />manner. <br />• The 25 -year storm design criterion for storm water control is not "highly questionable ". This <br />criterion exceeds the 10 -year design storm required by the sedimentation and erosion control rules <br />implemented by the North Carolina Land Quality Section, and is equivalent to the standard used for <br />lined municipal landfills. Design parameters for sedimentation and erosion control devices proposed <br />at the facility are yet to be established. Criteria for these will be established during the detailed <br />design required by the Construction Plan Application process, and could be based on a larger, less <br />frequent storm. <br />The EPA recently published results of extensive research in support of its decision to recommend <br />disposal of lead -based paint debris in C &D landfills rather than lined municipal landfills. In their <br />report, they state: "Thus, at the national level, the modeling results indicate that the impact on <br />groundwater at drinking -water wells down gradient of C &D landfills accepting LBP debris appears <br />to be very low and would only occur after an extremely long period of time. " (Federal RegisterNol. <br />63, No. 243/Friday, December 18, 1998/ Proposed Rules; Lead; Management and Disposal of Lead - <br />Based Paint Debris). <br />• In making the case for a high risk from dissolved arsenic, Dr. Kabala cited three laboratory studies <br />about the role bacteria play in dissolving arsenic under conditions devoid of oxygen. While correct <br />in stating that landfill waste becomes oxygen - starved, he says nothing about just how quickly these <br />extreme conditions change with distance from waste. He mentions nothing about the acidity of the <br />site subsurface, its high clay content, or its high iron oxide and sulfide contents, all of which tend to <br />adsorb free arsenic or limit its solubility. Nothing was mentioned about the concentrations of arsenic <br />found in the EPA's C &D Leachate Database (May 18, 1995 Draft Report on Construction and <br />Demolition Landfills, prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available online. <br />Response to Comments of Dr. Z.J. Kabala 4 Joyce Engineering, Inc <br />C&D Landfill Siting September 27, 1999 <br />Orange County, North Carolina <br />