Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
TABLE 2. SITES EVALUATED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION LANDFILL <br />SITE <br />LOCATION <br />AREA <br />EVALUATED <br />PROPOSED <br />ACTION <br /># <br />(AC) <br />BY JOYCE <br />FOR <br />CONSIDERATION <br />1 <br />Old NC 86 <br />130 <br />YES(4 /98) <br />YES <br />Lack of unanimity among governing boards (excessively priced and rural buffer). <br />Consideration by all boards prior to establishment of C &D task force. <br />2 <br />Old NC 86 <br />52 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Site configuration long and narrow making site undevelopable. Site located in <br />rural buffer. Site price was excessively priced. <br />3 <br />Old NC 86 <br />86 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Site configuration long and narrow making site undevelopable. Site located in <br />rural buffer. Site price was excessively priced. <br />4 <br />Ford Road <br />68.8 <br />YES(4 /98) <br />NO <br />Owner contacted for site walk. Taken off market by owner when told site was <br />4a <br />69.69 <br />YES(4 /98) <br />NO <br />being considered for C &D landfill. <br />5 <br />lWombles <br />185 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Site required a one mile long access road. Development costs would be <br />Loop <br />excessive. <br />6 <br />H <br />312 <br />YES(4 /98) <br />NO <br />Western portion of site OC -9 identified during siting study for a municipal waste landfill <br />in Orange County. Wet conditions and shallow bedrock limit development areas. <br />7 <br />1 Mt. Willing <br />75.57 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Site located on either side of road. Resulting parcels are too small to develop <br />Rd. <br />landfill. <br />8 <br />Guess Rd. <br />178 <br />YES(2 /99) <br />YES <br />Selected by C &D Task Force for evaluation. Option negotiated with executor. <br />Proposed for Board consideration. <br />9 <br />Mt. Carmel <br />67.65 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Site configuration long and narrow. Located in rural buffer <br />Church Rd. <br />10 <br />Hwy. 54 <br />59 <br />YES(4 /98) <br />NO <br />Site was sold during the evaluation before a decision <br />could be made to investigate further. <br />11 <br />Stagecoach <br />144 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Long and narrow. Stream cuts property into two pieces resulting in two long <br />Road <br />parcels that are undevelopable. <br />12 <br />Hwy. 86 & 49 <br />169 <br />YES(2 /99) <br />YES <br />Site favored by C &D Task Force. Taken off market by owners when told site was <br />being considered fo a C &D landfill. <br />13 <br />Hwy. 70 <br />62.65 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Site offered by Duke University. Stream cut property in half making property <br />undevelopable for a C &D landfill. <br />14 <br />Brook Hollow <br />53.08 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Stream and pond cut property into thirds making properety undevelopable for <br />a C &D landfill. <br />15 <br />Jones Ferry <br />431 <br />YES(4 /98) <br />NO <br />Only 180 acres located in Orange County. Site has rock outcrops and little soil <br />Rd. <br />available for cover. Owner would only sell entire site. <br />16 <br />New Sharon <br />61 <br />NO <br />NO <br />Site configuration long and narrow making site undevelopable. <br />Church Rd. <br />17 1 <br />Mill House <br />113.8 <br />YES(4 /98) <br />YES <br />Mrs. Blackwood's property. LOG voted not to pursue. <br />Rd. <br />9/20/99 <br />