Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
May 6, 2008 Draft Comprehensive Plan <br />Planning Board's Table of Proposed Revisions Minus Line Items Revised by BOCC <br />(Line items revised by the BOCC have been noted where applicable) <br /> m <br />y,. Q <br />c ~ <br /> PB Proposed Revision ° w ~ ~~ <br /> (Chapter breaks and new objectives are shaded) ~ a y ° <br /> o. <br /> ' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />' <br /> <br />w a~ <br />c o~ U <br /> <br />~ <br />m <br />' ° <br /> <br />,r c~ <br /> a ~ a <br />O om <br /> In FY 2006, Orange County experienced $7, 440 in peF <br />7) 3-10 48 saga retail sales per capita °mnnn ^n~m+i°c~ in +h° D°c•°~r^h Tri~n..l° <br />fegiea. BOCC 9/10/2008 <br />8 3-10 Fi 3-8 Delete Person Count from table. BOCC 7/9/2008 <br /> Looking at 2002 Census of Agriculture data, Orange County had fewer <br />9) 3-11 8 farms than most other counties in the °°°°'r^" Tri°^^'° region (Alamance, Staff 7/9/2008 <br /> Chatham. Durham and Wake Counties <br /> <br />10) <br />3-13 <br />47 "...largely due to the wages earned from employers located in the Research <br />PB <br />7/9/2008 <br /> Triangle Park and Duke University." <br /> Insert: Orange County is distinctive in that a substantial proportion of its <br /> citizens work in the Research Triangle, Durham and Duke University but <br /> <br />11) <br />3-16 <br />14 prefer to live in the County because of the high quality of life. These <br />PB <br />9/3/2008 <br /> residents typically earn above average incomes and make below average <br /> demands on public services. Public policies designed to increase iobs within <br /> Orange County should not reduce this appeal to commuters. <br />12) 3-16 21 What's in store for the next a~20 years? Staff 7/9/2008 <br />N <br />11/06/08 All comments from the May and August Public Hearings were considered by the Planning Board during its review process. 3 of 32 <br />