Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
number of tethered dogs involved in animal bites and aggressive incidents, nuisance barking or <br />unplanned reproduction. <br />At the September 22"d Work Session, the BOCC also asked about the rationale and benefits of <br />the proposed tethering ordinance given the requirements of the County's existing animal control <br />ordinance. Staff stressed the unique benefits of a tethering ordinance on the basis of the <br />successful experiences of other jurisdictions with similar restrictions. More specifically, they <br />indicated that the restriction of tethering had significant and numerous community benefits, e.g., <br />added public safety and enhanced public health, a reduction in animal nuisances such as <br />nuisance barking, and a reduction of unwanted pet reproduction. Staff indicated that these <br />community benefits were in addition to stronger legal standards for keeping and caring for <br />canine companions. <br />At the September 22"d Work Session, the BOCC also made several requests for the revision of <br />the proposed ordinance. These included <br />Clear size requirements for multiple dogs in the same enclosure <br />An exemption for tethered dogs with people in camping and recreational areas <br />An exemption for tethered dogs that are accompanied by and in the visual field of a <br />responsible person <br />All of these recommended revisions have been made in the attached version of the proposed <br />amendment (where they are highlighted). In addition, the timetable for implementation has been <br />adjusted to begin twelve months from adoption, with effective enforcement starting eighteen <br />months from adoption. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: The costs of administering and enforcing the new tethering provisions, if <br />enacted, are believed to be readily absorbed within the Animal Services departmental budget <br />and staffing complement. This expectation is based upon discussions with animal control <br />authorities in other jurisdictions with similar tethering regulations and the belief that effective <br />public relations and outreach can facilitate a transition in standards of animal care. Costs will be <br />incurred during the twelve-month period of public education and outreach. Staff expects that the <br />total costs will not exceed $1,500, and these monies will largely be used for display <br />advertisements. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board adopt the proposed ordinance <br />amendment on the tethering of dogs. <br />