Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-29-1999 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 09-29-1999
>
Agenda - 09-29-1999 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2008 2:25:12 PM
Creation date
10/27/2008 2:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/29/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
DENIED RES-1999-055 Resolution Indicating Orange County's Intention to Further Consider Development of a Construction and Demolition Landfill Siting
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
DENIED RES-1999-057 Resolution Indicating OC Intention to Further Consider Development of a Construction and Demolition Landfill Siting near Eubanks Road
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
Minutes - 19990929
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
RES-1999-056 Resolution Indicating OC Intention to Eliminate From Further Consideration The Development of a Construction and Demolition Landfill Siting Near Guess Rd.
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
RES-1999-058 Resolution Indicating OC Intention to Eliminate From Further Consideration The Development of a Construction and Demolition Landfill Siting near Eubanks Rd.
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,, <br />a. Continued adverse impacts on the same, long-suffering neighborhood; <br />b. Possible need to condemn. property; <br />c. Limited life expectancy of site. <br />Advantages: <br />a. Proximate to primary sources of waste generation; <br />b. Readily accessible via major transportation corridors; <br />c. Convenient to current salid waste operations; <br />d. Adjacent to property owned by landfill and potentially available for expansion of <br />solid waste operations (MRF, transfer station). <br />SUGGESTED ACTION: Accept Eubanks Road as an interim option. Develop a C&D <br />landfill there but pledge to thoroughly seek other sites, with the stated intention of fording <br />an alternative by the time the current MSW landfill is projected to close. (Simply choosing <br />to bury C&D in the MSW landfill is also an option, but one that's costly and tends to <br />impose greater time pressure on the process of developing alternative sites and <br />approaches.) <br />4. C&D Recycling <br />We need to go beyond current efforts to explore C&D recycling. Greater emphasis <br />must be placed on developing a creative, proactive, comprehensive C&D recycling <br />program. This might include: <br />a. A source separation ordinance, perhaps including on-site burial in some cases, <br />that would 'increase the efficiency of recycling efforts; <br />b. Exploration of synergies such as that between school and government use of <br />mulch, the need to ford good alternatives to burning debris from site clearing, and <br />construction scraps brought to the landfill. Similar wholistic approaches can be taken <br />toward agricultural waste, municipal biosolids (sludge), and other supposedly unwanted <br />byproducts generated within the county; <br />c. Explore whether C&D recycling is a viable economic development opportunity, <br />and whether it should be pursued and sited as such. <br />SUGGESTED ACTION: Seek a grant from the N.C. Department of Commerce to <br />develop a C&D site-separation recycling ordinance (unknown in the state) and to explore <br />the economic viability of C&D recycling in relation to current and projected markets and <br />as a public, private, or public/private venture. This would include studying what is done <br />elsewhere within and beyond North Carolina, and would be a joint undertaking of the <br />Economic Development Commission, the current solid waste staff, and the new Solid <br />Waste Advisory Board. The grant application deadline is Oct. 29. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.