Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-29-1999 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 09-29-1999
>
Agenda - 09-29-1999 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2008 2:25:12 PM
Creation date
10/27/2008 2:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/29/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
DENIED RES-1999-055 Resolution Indicating Orange County's Intention to Further Consider Development of a Construction and Demolition Landfill Siting
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
DENIED RES-1999-057 Resolution Indicating OC Intention to Further Consider Development of a Construction and Demolition Landfill Siting near Eubanks Road
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
Minutes - 19990929
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
RES-1999-056 Resolution Indicating OC Intention to Eliminate From Further Consideration The Development of a Construction and Demolition Landfill Siting Near Guess Rd.
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
RES-1999-058 Resolution Indicating OC Intention to Eliminate From Further Consideration The Development of a Construction and Demolition Landfill Siting near Eubanks Rd.
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ie~~ FJi~~~ s~f~ ~~~ ' ~_+~~ i i : ~~l <br />~~ <br />t7ear Orange County Commissioners: <br />Due to time constraints at last week's public hearing, one issue did not get spoken to very <br />coherently, What follows is a summation of the financial risks to Orange County that <br />would come with the selection of the Guess Road site. <br />The financial projections developed for the Guess Road site assume a continuation of use <br />at the same levels as at the present site on Eubanks Road. This is surely an overly <br />optimistic forecast, If we can look at this as a business for a moment, (and this is <br />presently amoney-maker for the county), a C&D landfill is dependent on its customers <br />coming to its place of business. In every business of this type, location is a very important <br />factor in predicting the volume of business that can be expected. Generally speaking, the <br />more time it takes for customers to get to the business, the more likely they are to look <br />for alternatives. <br />And far Chapel Hill area contractors needing C&D disposal, there are alternatives. <br />Durham's transfer station accepts C&D waste, as do C&D landfills in Wake County (on <br />highway 55) and in Alamance County (just ~ miles from Chapel Hill in Saxapahaw). <br />Although these county facilities are technically supposed to accept waste only from their <br />home counties, in practice few or no questions are asked, especially since C&D fees tend <br />to generate a profit for the receiving landfill. Gayle Wilson admitted to the truth of this <br />situation in response to a question at the community information hearing about C&b <br />waste coming to the proposed Guess Road site from northern Durham County. <br />There are also more than a half dozen private, state permitted "Land Clearing and Inert <br />Debris" landfills nearby (2 in Chapel Hill, 6 in Durham, 5 in Raleigh). The list of <br />materials these facilities are allowed to handle is amazingly close to what is allowed to go <br />into C&D landfills. The main differences axe that painted and treated wood are <br />technically not allowed in these "Inert Debris" facilities. Easily 80% of the materials <br />going into a C&D facility are also allowed in "Inert Debris" landfills. {See memo below <br />from the NC. DNER). <br />GIVEN THE AVAILABILITY OF DISPOSAL SITES CLOSER TO CHAPEL HILL <br />THAN THIS GUES" `~ SAD ~IT~ti ~' ~~, ~~ 7i~'~.~' ~ki.~~lti!i.u~~lTY'S C&D <br />B.ti~~~~,~~ ~ ~Alo.l~ ~'~' SI~t' ~ I'I' i~lC~VI~ IT"S LANbFILL S® <br />FAR FROM MOST OF ITS CUSTOMEkS. A.N ACTI;VTTY THAT IS NOW A <br />MONEY MAKER FOR THE COUNTY COULD WELL BECOME A MONEY <br />LOSER, IN NEED OF ANNUAL SUBSl77]ES. <br />This discussion also gives evidence that development activity in Orange County will not <br />come to a screeching halt if for a period of time the county itself does not provide a C&D <br />disposal facility. Alternatives do exist, and they can and will be used. <br />Thank you all again for your time and your consideration. <br />Tout Campbell <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.