Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 09-30-1999
>
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 10:58:37 AM
Creation date
10/23/2008 12:33:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/30/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990930
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange Water and Sewer Authority �. <br />" February 11,1999 <br />Page 13 <br />that there are community benefits in having reasonable controls on the extension of OWASA's retail <br />water and sewer lines and services within the southeastern part of Orange County and the urban <br />growth area for the Chapel Hfil- Carrboro community. <br />Mr. Davis said there was consensus from the local government representatives on the Water <br />and Sewer Boundary Task Force (Town of Carrboro, Town of Chapel HcQ, Town of Halsborough, <br />and Orange County) that by putting any typegof constraint on the provision of public water and <br />sewer utilities In areas outside of the urban service areas that the only alternative for providing water <br />and sewer services to new growth and development is by using alternative type systems. Patrick <br />Davis said alternative type systems are individual wells, private community water systems, individual <br />septic systems, or small - scale community-type' wastewater systems. The local government <br />representatives recognized and acknowledged that would be the preferred alternative approach in <br />the outlying,areas. <br />Mr. Davis said corresponding with the decision that the decentralized -type systems in the <br />rural buffer and in the water supply watersheds would be the appropriate approach then brought up <br />the issue of what happens In the event the alternative type systems fail and public utilities need to be <br />extended to correct a falling wastewater system or water supply wells that contain contaminants that <br />needs an alternative which might, in fact, need to be public water. Patrick Davis said in situations <br />that are dearly determined to be emergency in nature, carefully designed, carefully located and <br />controlled public utilities in the sensitive areas - rural buffer, and water supply watersheds could <br />under certain limited situations be acceptable. Mr. Davis said the agreement spells out some <br />situations In which public utility extensions might be appropriate in areas that would normally not be <br />considered appropriate for public utilities. <br />Mr. Davis said some of the areas where there has not been consensus have to do primarily <br />with dealing with the Intergovernmental agreements concerning wholesale transfer of water or <br />cooperative agreements regarding wastewater service and wastewater treatment -and particularly In <br />those Instances where it Is beyond the Orange County boundaries. Patrick Davis said those areas <br />have significant Iong -term Implications not just from a land use planning and growth management <br />standpoint In OWASA's service area in Orange County as a whole but there is also significant <br />implication from a water and sewer utility provision standpoint — reliability, quality of service, <br />economy of service, and the provision of the backbone infrastructure needed to meet the planned <br />Increases In water and sewer demands that come with the community's growth and development In <br />accordance with the adopted land use plans. <br />Mr. Davis said that he and Barry Jacobs represented the Board on the Water and Sewer <br />Boundary Task Force and they made It clear their opinions were their own and that the full OWASA <br />Board of Directors will state its opinion at the appropriate time. <br />Mr. Davis said the draft agreement Is getting closer to a final agreement. Two meetings have <br />been scheduled for March 1999 with the hope that the Wrier and Sewer Boundary Task Force will <br />conclude Its discussions and present a final agreement sh ullar In version and content to the draft <br />February 2,1999 Water and Sewer Management, Planning and Boundary Agreement. Patrick Davis <br />said there would be some provisions in the agreement that will not have consensus support of all the <br />Participants on the Task Force. <br />Mr. Davis said the Initial issue of a common boundary agreement with the Town of <br />Hillsborough has not bees formalized. There are some provisions In the draft agreement that the <br />representatives of the Town of Hillsborough said they could not and would not agree to. Patrick <br />Davis said that the elected representatives and staff of the Town of Hillsborough stopped attending <br />the Water and Sewer Boundary Task Force meetings and, therefore, there is concern about the Town <br />of Hillsborough's commitment to the agreement. <br />10.2.5 <br />IL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.