Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 09-30-1999
>
Agenda - 09-30-1999 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 10:57:20 AM
Creation date
10/23/2008 12:19:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990930
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NCDOT has limitations on their authority to ask for transportation improvements, both Orange County <br />and Hillsborough can require an augmented design and construction. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: A preliminary fiscal impact statistical report is attached. The tables note <br />expenditures (Table 1) and revenues (Table 2). <br />The calculations are basic since the information, service populations and budget are in the formative <br />stages of development. Non - residential fiscal impacts have never been generated previously and my <br />office is in the process of receiving input from all departments on the impacts of non - residential activity. <br />A model could then be more appropriately developed. Irrespective of the basal nature of the tables and <br />calculations, the numbers do show that development in most cases is not a revenue windfall. <br />The Town of Hillsborough analysis showed a deficit in early years with an eventual surplus in later years <br />which is primarily due to their provision of water and sewer. Hillsborough administration (as noted in <br />their fiscal report and presentation) and I will clearly add our disclaimers to the varied assumptions that <br />are made in this analysis. I believe property values are high and the feasibility of the scales of non- <br />residential development is questionable; both of which could distort revenue projections higher. <br />.,RECOMMENDATION(S): Receive as a report. <br />V <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.