Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-05-1999 - 10c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 10-05-1999
>
Agenda - 10-05-1999 - 10c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2008 11:26:05 AM
Creation date
10/23/2008 11:26:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/5/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991005
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Amongst single householders, females without children were slightly less likely to be poor than <br />their male counterparts. The number of female householders without children in poverty was <br />10% compared to 11 % for male householders without children. <br />The existence of children has a significant impact upon the occurrence of poverty. Overall, <br />irrespective of family status (i.e. single or married), a greater percentage of Orange County <br />households with children (9%) were impoverished, than their counter- parts without children <br />(4%). Among the different family types in the County poverty was most acutely felt by single <br />women who had more than one child between the ages of 5- 17 and a child less than 5 years of <br />age. Overa1150.9% of the 230 women in this category lived below poverty. <br />Spatial Distribution of Poverty <br />A larger percentage of persons residing in municipal portion of Orange County were living <br />below the poverty line than in rural Orange County. According to the 1990 Census 19% of the <br />county's municipal population (for whom poverty status is determined 45,077) is living below in <br />poverty. Within rural portions of the County the number declines by half, 8% of rural Orange <br />County residents (for whom poverty status is determined 39,479) live in poverty. Amongst <br />municipalities the largest concentration of poverty is found in Carrboro, followed by Chapel <br />Hill, Hillsborough and then Mebane. Within rural areas the highest incidence of poverty, for <br />residents for whom poverty status is determined, is found in rural portions of Cheeks township <br />where 11 % of residents are poor, Cedar Grove follows closely at 10%, while rural. portions of <br />Hillsborough are at 9%. <br />Household Income <br />Household income refers to the annual income of a householder and all other persons, related or <br />unrelated, 15 years of older that are living together. Because of the inclusion of one person <br />households in this measure, household income is usually lower than family income. Median <br />household income refers to the income value that 50% of all Orange County household are <br />above and 50°lo are below. <br />In 1989 the median income for an Orange County household was $29,968, when converted to <br />1997 dollars the value increases to $42, 685. Compared to counties in the Planning J region and <br />the state the median income for an Orange County household, in 1989, is lower ,than their <br />counterparts in Wake and Durham and higher than that of the state. <br />Median Household Income, Planning J Region <br />County . 1989 dollars 1997 dollars <br />Orange $29,968 $42,685 <br />Chatham $28,539 $36,940 <br />Durham $30,526 $39,511 <br />Johnston $25,169 $32,578 <br />Lee $26,419 $34,196 <br />Wake $36,222 $46,884 <br />North <br />Carolina $26,647 $34,491 <br />Source: 1990 US Census <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.