Agenda - 10-05-1999 - 9f - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

project. There are two well sites reserved on the property. There is also a possibility of a tie-in with Sedgefield and Stoneridge system since there is a main down the west side of Turkey Farm Road. He felt the community ell was, by faz, a better solution than individual wells. ~ Se ' k asked if a hydrological analysis done of the area so that the appli t knows what the aquifer is. Mr. Smyre responded that an analys has not been done by Kimley-Horn & Associates. While e aquifer i unknown, a letter has been received from the operator f the wells in S dgefield and Stoneridge that there is sufficient Ovate m the azea. It is also th responsibility, should the well ever dry up, of developer to produce ano er well or to dig the original well deeper to ovide water.. IVtr. Smyre con ued that there are a total of 251 lots ' Stoneridge and Sedgefield being erved by three wells which is app ximately 831ots per well, while this pr 'ect is one well for 64 lots. Strayhorn asked abo t the line size, noting th there aze water lines under the road. Mr. Smyre esponded that he did t have that information but the County Engineer uld be involved w' the actual water system. Barrows asked about the ocation of s tic easements for the seven lots that require easements. Mr. yre resp nded that the easements for lots 3 & 4 aze located across the stree on a c mer lot that is owned by the Homeowners Association. of has anoff--site easement on lot 13 across the open space, which is a dis ce of about 400. feet. Lots 45 and 52 have easements on a lot that is al caned by the Homeowners Association (he indicated the location on pla ,and lot 26 has an easement diagonally to lot 29. These solutions/ comme dations were prepared for the applicant by Allen Clapp, who i ith the O ge County Environmental Health Department and ve owledgeabl in this field. He felt these were good solutions. IVIr. Smyre ref ed to the Resolution of pproval and asked that Item C4 be amended read: A 50 oot buffer, as specified in the con act between Triangle L Conservancy aqd the developer sha be provided along rear of all lots located along the comm boundary with e proposed Triangle Land Conservancy pr erty. MOTION:. lkirk moved approval as recommended by the Pl ' g Staff with the equested change in Item C4 of the Resolution. Sec ded by Katz. VOTE: Unanimous. (4) Woodgreen (25 Lots -Cheeks Township) Presentation by Karen Lincoln. The Preliminary Plan for Woodgreen follows the conservation option of flexible development as described in the Subdivision Regulations. The applicant, Tri-Star, Inc., proposes to subdivide the property (30.7 acres)