Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 10-12-1999
>
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 11:12:45 AM
Creation date
10/22/2008 2:40:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/12/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION <br />OCTOBER 12,1999 <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />GIS PRESENTATION OF "GOOP" PLANNING MODEL <br />Introduction: The "GOOP" (Growth Optimum Overlay Plan) model was developed by the Orange <br />County Planning staff. The intent of the basic model was to visualize a growth model using GIS. <br />Planning theory and public facility attributes in Orange County were the basis of the map. Various layers <br />of information were created and values were assigned to buffers (linear areas of a particular width) <br />depending on the relative proximity of the service. <br />The highest value of 5 was assigned to an area where growth would be acceptable because a specific <br />attribute, such as a major transportation corridor, was located within 2 miles. The value decreases as <br />distance increases. The majority of model attributes (i.e. transportation, urban, public and non - public <br />services) illustrate where growth should be directed. <br />The second part of the model illustrates where growth should not occur such as watersheds, wildlife <br />corridors and poor soils. In this case, low values were assigned to these areas so the model, when <br />averaging all the attributes, would reflect the lowered growth value and therefore the relative sensitivity of <br />developing in that area. Zoning layers were not added since they are a secondary construct of a mix of <br />variables. <br />The final product of this model can be to reflect patterns of land use intensity and location including <br />environmental constraints. The model also notes the relative efficiency of providing services to different <br />areas. The model can serve as a preliminary growth plan on which to develop a land use element and <br />implementing zoning regulations. A thorough analysis of the various urban growth areas will be an <br />important aspect of the master plan. <br />WEIGHT PLANNING ATTRIBUTE <br />.20 I. TRANSPORTATION LAYER <br />5 — within 2 miles of I- 40/1 -85 <br />4 — within 4 miles of I- 40/1 -85 <br />3 — within 6 miles of I- 40/1 -85 <br />2 — within 8 miles of I- 40/1 -85 <br />1 -1 mile of NC54, NC86, NC57, NC157, NC49, US70 <br />0 — Remainder <br />II. URBAN SERVICE LAYER <br />.20 A. WATER AND SEWER <br />5 — Within Existing and proposed Service Area <br />4- <br />3— <br />2- <br />1- <br />0 — Remainder <br />Note: Differentiation between existing and proposed infrastructure was not available at this time in GIS <br />format but would be a good determinant to promote the efficient use of existing facilities before <br />utility extension are considered. <br />gAcraig \bocc- gis \10- 12 -99 \dg <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.