Orange County NC Website
CONTEMPORARY DESIGN POLICY MANAGEMENT HYBRID PLANS <br />LAND USE <br />DESIGN <br />MANAGEMENT PLAN <br />19908 DEVELOPMENT L <br />vRRB 19808 <br />�' �LICy 1'1.A14 1970s LAND SIFICA,nON PLAN <br />CL <br />19608 <br />GENERA <br />PLAN - <br />19508 <br />A <br />Perloff 1980 Chapin 1965 Beaman 1928 AU 1976 Growth Management 1970s, <br />Fagin 1959 Kent 1964 Planning Enabling Oregon 1973 AU 1976 <br />Meyerson 1956 701 Requirements' - Act 1928 CZMA 1972 Planning Theory 1960s <br />Walker 1941 1949.1954 Olmsted 1910 McHarg 1969 <br />Bassett 1938 Burnham 1909 Hawaii 1961 <br />FIGURE 1. The family tree of the land use plan <br />eral Oglethorpe's plan for Savannah.,- These plans, eluding "the general location and extent of new public <br />however, were blueprints for undeveloped sites, com- improvements ... and in the case of private develop - <br />missioned by unitary authorities with power to imple- merits, -the general distribution amongst various <br />ment them unilaterally (Reps 1965). classes of land uses, such as residential, business, and <br />In this century, perhaps the most influential early industrial uses ... designed for the future, twenty- <br />city plan was Daniel Burnham's plan for Chicago, five to fifty years" (Black 1968, 352 -3). Together, <br />published by the Commercial Club of Chicago (a Olmsted and Bettman anticipated the development of <br />civic, not a government entity) in 1909 (Schlereth -,the midcentury land use plan. <br />1981). The archetypical plan -as- inspirational- vision, Another early influence, the federal Standard City <br />it focuses only on design of public spaces as a City Planning Enabling Act of 1928, shaped enabling acts <br />Beautiful effort. passed by many states. However, the Act left many <br />The City Beautiful approach was soon broadened planners and public officials confused about the dif- <br />to a more comprehensive view. At the 1911 National ference between a master plan and a zoning ordinance, <br />Conference on City Planning, Frederick Law Olmsted, so that hundreds of communities adopted "zoning <br />Jr., son of the famous landscape architect and in his plane without having created comprehensive plans as <br />own right one of the fathers of planning, defined a city , the basis for zoning (Black 1968, 353). Because the Act <br />plan as encompassing all uses of land, private prop - also did not make clear the importance of comprehen- <br />erty, public sites, and transportation. Alfred Bettman, siveness or define the essential elements of physical de <br />speaking at the 1928 National Conference of City velopment, no consensus about the essential content <br />Planning, envisioned the plan as a master design for of the plan existed. <br />the physical development of the city's territory, in Ten years later, Edward Bassett's book, The Master <br />APA JOXMNAL- stnrrnM 1995 L36 <br />