Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 10-12-1999
>
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2008 2:43:58 PM
Creation date
10/22/2008 2:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/12/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Drafit 10/8/99 <br />C. <br />Establishment. of an °Open -Space Authority" <br />Closely related to the idea of a County land trust is .the option of <br />creating an Open Space Authority to coordinate the preservation of <br />land. Such an entity would be a special independent authority <br />.under the N.C. General Statutes, as OWASA is. <br />This. approach would also require special legislation from the <br />General. Assembly to set up an Open Space Authority6. Bylaws, a <br />charter, operating guidelines, and method of appointing a ,Board of <br />Directors .would. be needed .for startup of an authority. In other <br />respects, the authority would function much as the local <br />government land trust. would. The Board of Directors could be <br />charged with evaluating, land acquisitions and approval: of the <br />purchase of land within. guidelines .from the elected boards <br />involved. <br />As with the local government land trust, benefits from the open <br />space authority approach might include clarity of purpose :for <br />.acquisitions (preservation), the inclusion of a variety of interests. on <br />a Board of Directors, and the fact that an authority of this nature <br />would serve as an intergovernmental mechanism. <br />The disadvantages. of .this type: of arrangement .would include <br />questions about the ability to achieve the needed special <br />legislation, concerns .over the complexity and role of the authority, <br />the need for consensus among the local governments on the role <br />and activities of the authority, and the ability to ensure that needs <br />and interests are communicated. adequately to the Board of <br />Directors. Funding sources may also be complicated. <br /> <br /> <br />- S ecial le islation needed to create authori OWASA <br />- Potential inter overnmental fundin a ointments and nature <br />- . Char a and mission a reed to b the creatin a ies <br />- Board of Directors a ointed b the arties involved <br />- Staff throu h existin ERCD with assistance as needed <br />- Advanta e: Clari of ac uisition ur ose <br />- Advanta e: Coordinated inter overnmental mechanism <br />- Disadvanta e: Abili to achieves ecial le islation <br />- Disadvanta e: Unwield and com lex nature of arran ement? <br />- Disadvantage: Requires clear consensus among funding parties to <br />conve char a and interests <br />- Disadvanta e: Fundin sources com licated? <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.