Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 10-12-1999
>
Agenda - 10-12-1999 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2008 2:43:58 PM
Creation date
10/22/2008 2:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/12/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft 10/8/99 <br />D. Appropriations from .Other Local Governments and Public <br />Entities <br />This source may be more of a long-term proposition,. but it could be <br />a potential method if a joint acquisition mechanism is selected at <br />some point in the future. The possibilities for collaborative <br />acquisition- of parkNands, if .pursued, may facilitate efforts in -this <br />direction, .and -could prove a pilot project on ways to coordinate <br />funding.. from multiple public entities. Ways that this mechanism <br />could work might include: <br />Coordinated bond referenda. with the towns for agreed-upon.. <br />land resource acquisitions. Again, the parks area could be a test <br />case of this method. <br />Synchronized Capital Investment expenditures. Also <br />discussed in the Master Recreation and Parks report, this idea <br />has been. broached as a .way to more efficiently acquire and <br />develop parks and recreation facilities. This method would have <br />the participating: towns and County work together to adopt CIP's <br />such. that funding for parks and recreation needs from all <br />sources are. available at the time needed.. This approach might <br />also be workable for other land acquisition needs, where there <br />are.-common goals and objectives among the jurisdictions. <br />Finally, this method could also be explored with OWASA, which <br />is planning along-term land acquisition strategy in the Cane <br />Creek watershed.. <br />- Direct appropriations .from -other local general funds for <br />special cases ..that may arise (i.e., properties that have <br />significance across jurisdictional. boundaries). <br />- Collaborative acquisitions. with the University of North <br />Carolina or Duke University could be explored As previously <br />mentioned, both institutions are large landholders in the County <br />and contain many valuable resources.. This. approach could <br />.prove complex, however, and UNC's requirements for <br />.acquisition through the State may preclude this possibility. <br />E. Stewardship Endowments <br />The term stewardship relates to both long-term maintenance of the <br />site, and the cost of having it monitored by a knowledgeable <br />persona Research from the Land Trust Alliance indicates that <br />.stewardship and maintenance of properties can range as high as 8- <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.