Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-19-1999 - 9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 10-19-1999
>
Agenda - 10-19-1999 - 9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2013 10:23:47 AM
Creation date
10/21/2008 2:35:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/19/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991019
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
ORD-1999-016 Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment Z-3-9 Ernie McBroom
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 1990-1999\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Popular Government Spring 1993 <br />4.1 <br />http://ncinfo.iog.unc.edu/planning/pgsp93.htm <br />of the property affected, r8l nor that the text of the proposed ordinance be published. r9l But enough <br />detail must be printed to let a person know the nature of the zoning change being proposed and to clearly <br />describe the property involved (for example, by giving the street address). Just listing the ordinance <br />number with the date and time of the hearing will not suffice; the court of appeals held such a notice to <br />be inadequate. <br />By reading the notice, even the most diligent owner of property . . . would have no reasonable cause to <br />suspect that his property might be affected by the City's contemplated amendment to its ordinance. To be <br />adequate, the notice of public hearing required by G.S. 160A-364 must fairly and sufficiently apprise <br />those whose rights may be affected of the nature and character of the action proposed. F 101 <br />Individual Mailed Notice <br />In 1985 the General Assembly amended G.S. 153A343 and 160A-384 to require individual mailed <br />notice to those parties most directly affected by certain legislative zoning decisions: "zoning <br />classification actions." In 1987 this provision was amended to exempt the total rezoning of an entire <br />community from the mailed-no ' tice requirement. This exemption was itself modified in 1990 to require <br />mailed notice in total rezonings if the rezoning involves olves "down zoning" or zoning to a less intense <br />use. rl 11 (See Table 2.) <br />Most aspects of the mailed-notice requirement are clear. The notice should include the same information <br />contained in the published notice, should advise persons of the proposed zoning change, and should be <br />mailed in time for receipt a reasonable time before the hearing. The mailed notice need only be made by <br />first-class mail. It does not have to be registered or return-receipt mail. Some zoning ordinances go <br />beyond this to require certified mail, and some zoning offices do so as- a matter of office policy, but that <br />is not required by statute. Also, the notice is to be mailed to the owners as identified by the county tax <br />records; an updated title search is not required. If there are no tax maps available for the area, the <br />mailed-notice requirement does not apply. 12 <br />All rezonings that amend zoning district boundaries require mailed notice. In general, it is also required <br />for the application of new overlay zones, the application of zoning to new extraterritorial areas, and the <br />initial adoption of zoning. Mailed notice usually is not required for most routine zoning text changes, <br />since they do not affect the basic zoning classification of property. 13 <br />The.mailed notice also must be sent to all "abutting" property owners. As a matter of practice, some <br />cities send a mailed notice to all who would qualify to sign a -protest petition whether or not they have <br />technically abutting parcels of land. This generally includes the owners of both the property being <br />rezoned and the property within 100 feet (excluding abutting'rights-of-way) of that property. <br />The statute does not require the local government to do the mailing if it is not initiating the rezoning.. <br />Several zoning ordinances place much of the administrative and cost burden on the party requesting a <br />rezoning, by requiring that person to provide a certificate that the mailing was done or to provide <br />stamped, addressed envelopes to the local government to deposit in the mail. Many other local <br />governments require that a list of those to be mailed notices be provided as part of any petition for a <br />rezoning. <br />The mailed-notice requirement has been subject to more modification by local legislation than any other <br />mandated zoning procedure. Given the high cost of individual mailings when a substantial rezoning is <br />proposed, eighty-five local governments have sought and received legislative relief. The most common <br />modification has been to substitute publication once a week for four weeks of a large display <br />advertisement in a local Awspaper in lieu of mailed notices. r 141 <br />Speakers and ivid'ence <br />Public hearings on legislative zoning decisions must be conducted in a fair and impartial manner, but the <br />formalities of an evidentiary hearing--oaths, exhibits, cross-examinations, avoiding gathering evidence <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.