Browse
Search
Minutes - 20080219 - Transfer Station
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Minutes - 20080219 - Transfer Station
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 12:14:16 PM
Creation date
10/20/2008 12:03:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/2008
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
Minutes TS
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-19-2008-Transfer Station
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 02-19-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> D. Park preserves. <br /> E. Sites (single parcel or combination of parcels) must be at least 25 acres. <br /> F. Site must be located within Orange County. <br /> G. Site must be located within 3 miles of US 15-501, NC 54, NC 86, US 70, NC <br /> 57, 1-40, or 1-85).' <br /> H. Site cannot be located in a critical watershed.2 <br /> Ed Schuffler said that the list has changed a little based on the discussions at the <br /> last meeting. He made reference to items A, B, C, and D and said that the consultants <br /> have been working with Planning staff on setting these definitions. These items are all <br /> under what is considered the Primary Conservation Area, and they are defined under the <br /> land use element. These definitions will be brought back on March 18th and reviewed. <br /> Regarding the floodplains, the FEMA flood insurance rate maps will be used. <br /> There was some discussion of eliminating areas within city limits, but Commissioner <br /> Gordon said that some towns may have property they want to offer up, so it was left as an <br /> option. <br /> Commissioner Gordon made reference to eliminating areas with steep slopes and <br /> asked what was decided about this. Ed Schuffler said that this would have to be added as <br /> a separate category. <br /> Commissioner Foushee said that she thought this was discussed in the context of <br /> the technical siting criteria and not preliminary exclusionary criteria. She made reference <br /> to Exhibit 5, item 1. Ed Schuffler said that if there were too steep of an area, it would have <br /> to be excluded. He said that just because something is on the technical criteria list does <br /> not mean that it cannot also be used as exclusionary criteria. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that steep slopes were brought up under technical <br /> criteria, but she thinks that it belongs in exclusionary criteria. <br /> Ed Schuffler said that he would like to add steep slopes 15 percent or greater into <br /> the exclusionary criteria. He asked the Board of County Commissioners about this. <br /> Commissioner Gordon made reference to excluding towns and Geof Gledhill had <br /> said that the cleanest thing to do was to not go into the towns or the extraterritorial <br /> jurisdictions. She thinks that if there were a town or University site that was offered, that it <br /> should not be excluded. Otherwise, she thinks that if there is any conflict that the towns <br /> and ETJ should be left out. <br /> Commissioner Carey said that he does not have a problem with including steep <br /> slopes above a certain percentage in the exclusionary criteria. He asked for more <br /> discussion about park preserves. <br /> Ed Schuffler said that the Planning staff is looking at this now and pulling together <br /> the definition. <br /> Chair Jacobs asked why NC 57 was on the highway list. Also, he wants to know <br /> what part of NC 86 is being considered. He does not think that large trucks should have <br /> to travel from the source of most of the solid waste through Hillsborough and to the north. <br /> Ed Schuffler said that the Planning staff pulled the map together that showed the major <br /> roadways. This was discussed at a previous meeting about setting up a distance off of <br /> 'Recommend that location of site with respect to rail access be included in the consideration of Technical <br /> Criteria. <br /> 2 Recommendation that protected watersheds also be included in the criteria being reviewed by County staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.