Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - 6e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 10-21-2008
>
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - 6e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2008 4:04:31 PM
Creation date
10/17/2008 4:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081021
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Laura Blackmon, County Manager <br />COPIES: Willie Best, Asst. County Manager <br />Pam Jones, Purchasing & Central Services Director <br />Donna Coffey, Budget Director <br />Kevin Lindley, PE, Engineering Associate <br />FROM: Paul Thames, PE, County Engineer <br />DATE: September 5, 2008 <br />SUBJECT: Efland Sewer Rate Study <br />As per Asst. Manager Willie Best's request, the following information related to the Raftelis <br />study for setting Efland sewer rates is provided for your information and to assist you and <br />the BOCC in making both budget decisions and decisions as to how to set Efland sewer <br />rates so that the County`s contribution to the Efland sewer fund can range from none at all <br />to as much or more than the current contribution. <br />The Raftelis study was ultimately designed to consist of three parts: 1) a model in the form <br />of a set of interrelated spreadsheets that allow one to input a number of factors, <br />assumptions and projections related to number of customers, operating costs, <br />maintenance costs, NPDES permit compliance costs, capital improvement costs, <br />treatment costs, etc. and a sewer rate (per thousand gallons) to derive a shortfall in <br />operating and CIP costs that would be covered by a County contribution to the fund: 2) a <br />written report outlining the basis of the model, its operation or manipulation, and its built-in <br />assumptions (base rate, etc.); and 3) a verbal report and demonstration of the model's <br />functionality. The study will not make a recommendation as to an actual sewer use rate. <br />The ultimate product of the model is, however, a sewer use rate based on the inputs <br />outlined above and the amount of funds, if any, that the BOCC determines to provide to <br />continue directly subsidizing the costs of operating and maintaining the system. <br />The BOCC has indicated that it wants to develop a strategy that minimizes the impact of <br />increasing sewer rates on low income households. Unfortunately, it is not legally possible <br />to adopt a sewer rate structure that addresses this goal directly. While it may be possible <br />to set rates that group users by category, those categories must be based on <br />characteristics such as quantity of sewer use, residential or non-residential commercial/ <br />institutional/industrial, etc. The sewer use rate must be the same for each customer in <br />each category that is created. However, as most low income and single occupant <br />households tend to be among the lower water/sewer consumers, eliminating the base rate <br />used in the current rate structure (minimum charge for 3000 gallons per month of sewer <br />use) should provide some relief from an elevated sewer use rate/cost per thousand gallons <br />to low use households (those that use significantly less that 3000 gallons per month). <br />Another option to provide relief for low wealth households is for the BOCC to set aside <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.