Agenda - 10-21-2008 - 4n - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

L'~1?AM;fI . ~7 RP.Q771{C ~ QT~P.R7A~ IYQP nAT711~{ T[!IO fr~lYn{{r Paov3 tt) of if) ~(,~ ~re a permit from such otfkxr, ar hoard, to be Issued when rte or it so detetrrrines, as a furti-ar t:oruJigon preoedetlt to tie right tD erect such structure in such eras, Such ptmnft is not one for a variance ar departure from Lhe statute or ordinance, but Is Lha retagaiUo0cc~~ of a right estabtfsfled by the statute ar ordinance itself. Consequently, tfie delegatiarr to suds affker, or beard, of authority to make such determination as to the existence or rmnextstence of the speaFEed conditions it not a delegation of the legislative poster to trraloe law. , ?~dtsnn v Barr! efAdfitsrma.,~, 275 ~ ~~:16~~66 5 E Z 78 BS fill 'ills [*as~7 dar3sian of the patid of the Court oP Appeals below held that the same logic that pemnits the County Commisslontrs to delegate'autf>nrtty to the ZoNnq AdmFnistrator to issue special use permits also supports our dads>on that rile Comrntssioners have auti~or9ty bo agow the Zonhtg AdminESgator to issue permits [*gig7 for "uses 17y right Subjed: to special requtremerns.° We agreo. LIlce rile panel below, we hold that Crmilty Cwrlmissionars have authority to allanv the Zonkrg Admintstratvr ba issue permits for "uses by right subject to spedal requirernerrts.' . Surnrr>ary . We assume standing of the plaintiffs atguenrla. We hold that the 3 Baguet f~988 judgment in the earlier utigatiort has no eEIect on tine present litigation. We'furthar hold that jhe 1 May 1989 anterrdrnent to the zoning ordlnaACe oonstikutes a vaUd legislative prerogative tp dlarlge the SanRarY IandtUl use from a 'special rtes permit" category oo wise by right under presuibeit sondltions" category and ' that Section 3124 of the Mexidentwrg tbunLy zoning orrUnarlca, which Mows the Zontng Administrator to approve tits Count's permit app>tcation far the sitlnq of a landtlll, is constihrtiona] and tawful on Its fay. The decision [•**3t'z7 of the Court of Appeals is aflirtrled. AfFiRMED. ~C$> ~ a> NC titers Cases, Cooiir[s•dQ~ 7'amc: sp•sitl use p•mrllvrls eovMy [r~i Sesrd,l View: Fes( DAtalTNlle: Ttsasday, MJarch 6.200! -4:07 trkl EST Yyarr Neaaeve tremmsnt 6s fndicstsd ®- erred; Voiid~ questloned by Td&rp Tats - Csuamr: Patstbk n•patha• ttaeUnmd 4- PosRbasmeabtlentisindkamd - ClinO RefA l~ltgr Analysis AraAsti• C.&a<Ton iniottire0orr eva~5ia tic cn ~ SAgrerd~ sped to SMpardtae®Oud w•s. I ~ (Sr~iQ'r' Tg~ I c3et a n„t ~ I Aitld& I To#al usaainr i Tranaadie0el advianr I t1~aclPpLmrrrl~ Qeuira U•dt+~.taentlliUaas>ellid•. ~P.XI~ ilaniar w i+a•. AA rlQats reserved. httv://www.lacis.ootnhresearr~fretfieve? m=$544c535004351da?e1ceb9~efaQ69a5&doc~u... 3/6/2008