Agenda - 10-21-2008 - 4n - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~ ~..vlt I. .. I I KYY. IIIV r VT\W~\P. \1P". Td.•TS..f s. •,h hA\\'1\T\T YI\no i ~~ .li 6dmt0Ia1El> > Sipg ~1 ape, /.las> 7s1at69 a ~ •^? u~ > SM~.yennka !E yar's,~erc qo H~Quad~trdkiai ipedal use perms decisions may not be assigned bo the zoning administrator. More laa. ~ H"eduete ~ ~ram.e„ler L>r~>r_ > 7."nr,e aSaadS~ > aIIl lGed~lrs~~ . sin } a t~ 8atl.~cttex> pnnkw a ~ ilea a ~1LPfJxIlhF.lt ~*~ ~ . ~~The zvnTrsg enabling statutes allow apedat end eorxlRtona! use pemtitt decisions !p tae made by the board of edjusgnent or the goverr>ing board. N_ - ..n. Slat. ~ s93A-3ao {1991), 16AA-981(1987). N.C~a+ 5Ya-t, ~§ 1~s~~and 3,89A: ~8$ hrrtiler aifow the dutles of the board of adjustmetlt to be sssagn~ to a °pianning agency." MEre uk.7his Headnefa taro > fentwe A L"1." Ui! y ~ N.C. Gen..stat. g.15#A-~1 provtdes that an agency Veeb~ ar destgnabed pursuant to this section may ir-dude but shall not be limited tb ons ar mwe of the following, with any stat'f that the board of carrunFsstaters considers appropriate: (i) A planning board or wrtrmissian of any size (Trot less than three metrtbers) ar composition considered approprtate, 'organtaaf to any manner mnsldered appropriate: (2) A joint planning board. Mare Lab chic xndnoee ~> >> ~ ' > fe,dne ". r„ul +~. yS70GdRf0IDLVBGE!RrIIU > zeldne a i and Lhi. ? ) Peemrts a Vaderv~s ~s*+~ While x.c. Gerr_ Stet >;i3.~nr .t gives tog! government considerabl9 latitude, t8at latitude doss not extend far enough to aNow ttis designal1ori of the inning adminislxator individually bo wnsUtute a •ptarating agency" for the purpose of maWng special and cortdigonat use perrntt decisions. !Sara! ~Uils x~~e 1 sueoedhr: aeitrkt s„ xe:dnoto edmrlsbernle 1 em y > leslstetlfreSso~s > Gm>e>t~.Q~e ~ . keel Prenelty taol> ~> ~ ' ra'r~tAQrile and 3~ mandate that graMS of autltority to Iorai governments ba broadly lntarprdted, zonhsg autilorlty cannot bt exercised in a manner contrary bo the express provfsior-s of the zoning enabing authafty. tlra~elxcen,>s xeaAm4e ~ ~> zeMno a reed Llw > LBmdeslr ~ . ~'=r+•A zoning ordinancz ~ presumed Valid, etK! the ulurts will deer tp the governing board`s leglstatlve judflment unless ~ Is dearly srrxeasanabk or art abuse of d'recretion. j~1 rnnalherneul'f-w.,>> >Pp~ >c.•nro oromses~en mil) Rose ymn"rrv 1 ew > ~C> . yea rMna~Oue prncess'tagtAres an impartial dedsionmaker. Whit ksgidative zoning dedstons, an elected otiitia[ with a d7ed: and sub5tartt181 tirlarrdai (merest in a aonklg tiedston may not parttdpate in making first decision. M C ~S^ Stet GS 1'~A-A4 (1991), iSQM75 (1987).1Mtlere there is a spedflc, s+rbstarli3ai, and reeddy idengflab[e Anan¢a[ Impact on a member, rwnpertidpatwtt Gs roqutrad. Additional cderattons beyond these fUtandai interests require nonparttdpatlon in ttuttsi- judidal zantng dedstana. A fixed opinion that ls.not susoeptlbfe to dtange shay well cortst3tuta Impermissibie bias, as will utuAsdosed ex parka communigtiat of a dose familial or business relationship wRh an applicant. I • a aka r+ivta~; the pubik polky Is pronamoed against perrr><ttNlg ate bo sit in judgmerst on his own cause, or to act on a matxer affedlnp die public when he has a direct pssesuriary Interest. ~ro~ehrf r e,. > > ImOHClalnt > ~sz~loa~lJ~> . +~~Absent a shornring of undue ksfluanoe, the fart that an app~caflon Fs made by an employing salt of govemrnent does not in and of tonstalrbe impemrl~ibie 61as for admirdstrative zoning ds. Mere Lxc~r~s HeemroLe 6~moistr~x..tax[> ~ >?;midedlilf4t> ~wi . u.el Preesrty ew y p~ 1. Ile. y ~~lr7littl~t rM-u~A key element In the dat;ecminattan of undue Influence in quasi- judtclal zontrsg determinations is the degree of dtsrretlon present kr the derision, which is also a key Sacra in thG characberizai9ort of a dedsial as quasi-judkiai pr admtafstrattve. The g the rar-ge of discretlar In ezerdsing that autlwrtty, the greater must be the concern that tfie petsotl exerdsJng R be tree of conflici4ng persor~l interests. More like sine xead~a I ~*-eeMhe• nnrnirt av Fteadnoke ~ y g~era ran N oewe~a 4aINi6." :~.'S2n'+~" > l~RQ~OBaIl1 Sail>> nea,rn11.~ y z.".rne~".~' => o".a7M 1 ya nrac ~al Knsz~Wtwt a statute, or ordlnamx, provides that a type of structure may not be erected In a spedfled area, except that arch structure maybe erected thereit when certain cadltAans exist, one has a right, under the statute a ordinance, to Such strudalre upon a siwwing that the spedfled mndkions do exist The legislative body may contEr trpan an administrative officer, or board, file autfiortty to detet7rtirte whether the spedtled corrdttions do, in Pad:, exist and may require'a permit Fran ssrclt otficsx, or board, to be issued when he ar b sa determines, as a ttather condltian precedent to the right bo erect: such tArutture in such ar+ed. Such permit is not one for a vaeance os departuns from the statute a ordxranrg; but is the recognition of a right estabt~hed by fire statute ar ordinance itself. CQttsequendy, the detegatton to surfs oPfiee+r, oc board, of auiilortty to make sucAt de4ertnination as to the ext9tenee or rmrrexfsterue of the spedfkd m la ,~ ~~.:: •.~ h##pJlwww laxis.caz}alresearr'h/xetrieve?_m~8540c535004351da7e1 cebg5efa0b9a5&c3ocxcu... 31f/2408