Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-03-1999 - 9f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 11-03-1999
>
Agenda - 11-03-1999 - 9f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 11:19:53 AM
Creation date
10/17/2008 2:50:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991103
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br />i) What are the expected outcomes and how are these measured? Are <br />the outcomes stated qualitatively and quantitatively? <br />j) Is the environment or situation changing, or about to change? That is, <br />are new buildings coming on line? Is new equipment to be installed? <br />Are there federal or state laws that are changing? <br />1) Analysis and Recommendation of the Review - Once the information is <br />gathered, the Study Team will analyze all data and develop <br />recommendations, in consultation with the appropriate department head, for <br />the County Manager's consideration. <br />2) Records- Records should be kept on internal evaluations of services, and <br />evaluation criteria should be identified so that the process is auditable. <br />e. The Committee recognizes that there are a variety of strategies and resources that may <br />be used to conduct the model evaluation process. Among others are (1) the use of an <br />internal evaluation team as described in the model process, (2) using external private <br />management consultants to conduct evaluations, (3) using local active or retired <br />community business leaders willing to volunteer consulting expertise, or (4) using local <br />University support such as faculty and students. <br />f. The priorities for review should be: <br />1. County Departments <br />a) Social Services, including Veterans Affairs <br />b) Health Department <br />c) Other County Departments as needed <br />2. Intergovernmental <br />a) Recreation and Parks <br />b) Public Works (Solid Waste /Landfill) <br />c) Library <br />d) Co- operative Extension Service <br />Recommendation 5: Develop a process of program and trend analysis as a policy making <br />tool for public officials, and to enhance managerial decision making. <br />The process should be open for continuous refinement, and should be part of the finance and <br />budget process. The goals of the program and trend analysis are to enhance efficiency and <br />public accountability through: <br />• Creating an objective and credible set of data that is open to refinement. <br />• Indicating spending patterns by department and service. <br />• Indicating expenditures within the framework of constant dollars, population <br />growth, per pupil spending, etc. <br />Z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.