Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-03-1999 - 9f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 11-03-1999
>
Agenda - 11-03-1999 - 9f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 11:19:53 AM
Creation date
10/17/2008 2:50:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991103
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br />County Expenditures -- Schools. The school systems, for example, consume the greatest <br />amount of County funds in relation to other areas of the County budget. The Committee is <br />deeply concerned, therefore, about future trends in expenditures. If these trends continue at the <br />same rate in the future, pressure to increase the total County budget (and by implication, the <br />County tax rate) will place an even greater burden on those County citizens already bearing a <br />heavy tax load. <br />Because each school system reports to a different authority (School Board), our review does <br />not encompass the schools' operating budgets. However, it is important to note that the <br />County's per pupil expenditure for current expense has increased in the past five years from <br />$1,310 per pupil to $1,571 per pupil, a total per pupil increase of 20 percent. The total amount <br />appropriated for school current expense has increased by $6.3 million, a 42 percent increase <br />over that same five year period. Furthermore, the County has invested an average of $8.5 <br />million per year in capital improvements and debt service of funds borrowed for school <br />improvements, over the past five years. While the Committee recognizes growth in student <br />population over the past few years, it also believes that based on current growth projections by <br />the State Department of Public Instruction through the year 2002 that Orange County has <br />(within its existing structures) the buildings to accommodate that growth. <br />The Committee recommends, therefore, that careful consideration be given to all viable <br />alternatives before investing more funds in capital projects. The Committee also recommends <br />that the Board of Commissioners encourage the Boards of Education to employ a similar kind <br />of "in depth" innovation and efficiency analysis to identify potential savings within the school <br />systems. Although we recognize that the Commissioners have little direct say over school <br />expenditures, we do feel that their expertise and influence in such matters is invaluable. <br />County Expenditures - -Human Services and Outside Organizations. The Committee also <br />looked at other trends in County spending, particularly in areas of Human Services and <br />financial support to outside organizations. Together with school spending, the overall increases <br />in expenditures point to the need for a more systematic means of analyzing trends in spending. <br />Because this kind of analysis is so important for all participants (elected officials, program <br />staff, and citizens) we feel that the County should develop a formal capacity for program and <br />trend analysis. Such analysis could be updated annually, would provide quick access to <br />credible and useful data, and could flag or highlight unusual spending patterns. Moreover, the <br />analysis would provide other useful "indicators" related to the history or background of <br />expenditure trends and thereby help to discern the basis for such spending. <br />Evaluate Future Success. Finally, the Committee believes that the core of the Committee's <br />recommendations embody essential tools for crafting major efficiency and cost savings. We <br />recommend, therefore, that the Commissioners allow these tools to be put to work as soon as <br />possible. We also believe that because of everyone's hard work and investment in the <br />innovation and efficiency process, we would like to measure our aggregate success by <br />reconvening in six to eight months. At that time, the Committee could determine the progress <br />made thus far, and offer any guidance for continued success. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.