Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-03-1999 - 9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 11-03-1999
>
Agenda - 11-03-1999 - 9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2008 2:48:32 PM
Creation date
10/17/2008 2:48:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991103
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
RES-1999-072 Resolution Initiating the Extension of Main Water Lines to the Vicinity of the Eubanks Road Landfill
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br />There were a number of problems encountered during the survey process. Technical problems related to <br />equipment malfunction with the GPS units and the accuracy of existing mapping of properties not <br />recently surveyed introduced an element of error and inaccuracy to the process. A number of the <br />residents of the Rogers community declined to participate in the survey process and many who did <br />participate were difficult to contact. These problems, along with shortcomings in the process of <br />.developing criteria for the initial design study undertaken for OWASA, lead.to a number of caveats for <br />this report. The number of residents with the corresponding socio-economic data is underreported as a <br />result ofnon-participating households. Several households located in remote areas of the neighborhood <br />and which should be included in utility plans were undetected in the utility design study process giving <br />rise to the potential for inaccurate estimation of utility construction and plumbing service costs. The <br />neighborhood contains a number of unoccupied buildings and mobile homes. The decisions as to <br />whether to classify individual structures as merely uninhabited and needing utility service or as actually <br />abandoned and uninhabitable and not needing utility service may be erroneous in some instances and <br />lead to inaccurate cost estimates. OWASA connection fees used in this report were derived from <br />information contained in the initial. utility layout study. Those fees have since been revised such that <br />current connection fees should be somewhat less. Finally, construction costs for water main and related <br />construction and for the installation of individual plumbing services often vary wildly, depending on <br />demand for contractors, labor, materials, etc. <br />The findings of this latest engineering study, in terms of various cost elements and socio-ecanamic data <br />can be summarized as follows: <br />1. The total estimated construction costs for mains, service taps, meters, etc., for the entire 119 <br />properties shown on the attached map of the Rogers Road Community - $560,500 <br />2. The total estimated plumbing costs for individual service lines between service .meters and internal <br />household plumbing systems for the entire 119. properties shown on the attached map of the Rogers <br />Road Community - $257,400 <br />3. The total estimated utility service fees for the entire 1.19 properties shown on the attached map of the <br />Rogers Road Community - $215,300 <br />4. The total estimated cost of the water service community benefit for public funding of all <br />construction, plumbing and service fees for the entire 119 properties shown on the attached map of <br />the Rogers Road Community is $1,033,200. <br />5. The water service benefit, as costed out above, can make water service available to 119 properties, <br />98 dwelling units of which 81 are known to be currently inhabited. <br />6. These units house more than 134 individuals, of which at least 105 are known to be considered to be <br />of low/moderate income (according to 1998 HLTD criteria for Orange County), at least 25 are known <br />to be at least 60 years old and at least 27 are known to be less than 15 years old. <br />7. At least 34 of the occupied dwellings are reported to have some sort of problem with quality of their <br />on-site drinking water supplies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.