Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2008 2:58:06 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:58:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/9/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991109
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Durham, North Carolina <br />August 25,1999 <br />Memo To: ~ . ~ P. Lamont Ewell, City Manager. <br />Through: Gregory A. Bethea, Assistant City Manager <br />From: Dick Hails, Interim Planning Director ~~.~- <br />Subject: Public Hearing=Urban Growth Area Boundary <br />. Executive Snmmarv <br />One important tool for managing the City's physical growth is the Urban Growth Area (UGA) <br />boundary. The UGA represents the area where the City intends to allow the extension of public <br />sewer and water services, and where the City eventually intends fo annex. The UGA <br />amendments implement the changes proposed in the Durham 2020 Comprehensive Plan, respect <br />service area agreements with adjacent murricipalities and implement policies for watershed <br />protection. Three major amendments are proposed. <br />• First, the UGA boundary would expand in the vicinity of Russell Road in northwest Durham. <br />to take advantage of improvements in the water distn~bution system. This expansion would <br />not push the UGA farther into the Little River Reservoir drainage basin. <br />• Second, the UGA boundary would contract in the vicinity of Hamlin Road in northeast <br />Durham to exclude portions of the Falls Reservoir Critical Area. This would not contract the <br />UGA boundary in the Ellerbee Creek basin where the County is presently surveying the <br />location of the Reservoirs' normal pool. <br />Third, the UGA boundary would contract in southeast Durham in the area between NC 98 <br />and US 70.. The intention is to prevent a pattern of "leap frog" development, i.e:, new <br />. development away from the edge of the present City limits. Three options are offezed for <br />City Council consideration, including maintaining the present UGA, contracting the UGA to <br />the line identified in the 2020 Plan and contracting to a line mid-way between the two. <br />In:addition; several Honor amendments are proposed to take advantage of new development . <br />opportunities with little impact .on planned utility services. The Planning Staff recommends that <br />the City Council adopt the amended UGA boundary, including the northwest expansion, the <br />northeast contraction, the southeast contraction (Option 3) and the minor amendments ,all <br />descn~bed in the report and pn display maps. ~ . <br />Background <br />For years, Durham has used the Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary as a tool to manage its <br />physical growth. The Durham 2020 Comprehensive Plan defines the UGA as the portions of <br />Durham County (and the edges of surrounding counties) that are appropriate for urban and <br />suburban land uses. The UGA represents the area around the City that can expect public sewer <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.