Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 11:21:40 AM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:32:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/9/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991109
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,4 <br />To: Gavle Wilson <br />From: Ed%vard Pullan <br />Date: June-29,1998 <br />ATTACHMENT 3 -1 <br />Re: C&D Tickets from May, 1998; and <br />Construction and Demolition Waste Survey <br />C &D Tickets from May. 1998 <br />A preliminary review of the C&D deliveries for the month of W. 1998 show that there had been 2,089 <br />C&D deliveries to the landfill during the calendar month, the majority of those coming from smaller <br />loads. <br />Of 2,089 total C&D deliveries, 1,255 (60.1 %) were less than one -ton. <br />In terms of the number of customers potentially impacted: 116 different landfill customers delivered C&D <br />waste to the landfill during the month and 80 (69.0 %) has deliveries of 1 -ton or less. <br />The greatest number of small loads were received, not unexpectedly, from "Miscellaneous Cash <br />Customer" and "Orange County." <br />Customer (Cult. #) Total Loads Less than 1 -ton <br />Misc. Cash Customers (044) 908 662 (72.9 %) <br />Orange County (107) 325 286 (88.0 0/6) <br />Other landfill accounts that appear likely to deliver smaller C&D loads include public agencies and <br />smaller non -profit organizations: <br />Customer (Cost. #) <br />Total Loads <br />Less than 1 -ton <br />Town of Chapel Hill <br />62 <br />59 (95.2 %) <br />Carrboro <br />21 <br />12 (57.1 %) <br />UNC and Hospital <br />42 <br />19 (45.2 0/6) <br />CH- Carrboro YMCA <br />4 <br />4(100%) <br />PTA Thrift Shop <br />5 <br />4(80.0%) <br />It would appear that the absence of a "local" C&D disposal facility would most heavily impact customers <br />with smaller loads of C&D waste to dispose of as the additional cost and distance to transport that waste <br />to a distant facility would be most burdensome and add to their costs of operations. <br />Construction and Demolition Waste Survev <br />A surrey of all in- coming loads of C&D waste was conducted at the landfill between Friday and Tuesday <br />(June 26's to 30`s). consisting of the questions and possible responses outlined below. The responses to <br />each question have been tabulated to show the raw number of each type of response and the percentage of <br />particular responses to each question. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.