Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 11:21:40 AM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:32:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/9/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991109
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
control over facility operations than if a private facility were simply encouraged to set up operations <br />and accept C &D wastes originating in Orange County. Other public - private partnership <br />arrangements are also possible. Any public - private arrangement would require using a contractor <br />with a proven track record in this arena due to the high risk of such operations and high failure rate <br />acrooss the nation. There is often a differential between reported true recycling and actual practice. <br />For example materials reported as "beneficial fill" may go to improve a road on -site or fill in a <br />" low area". <br />Another approach could entail building, owning and operating our own facility. Under this <br />sceanrio, any revenue from tipping fees or sale of materials would come to us. In December <br />1996, staff conducted an analysis of constructing a semi - automated construction and demolition <br />waste recycling facility with some hand - picking and some automated sorting.. (The whole <br />December 1996 memorandum is available on request) An update to the costs of the facility <br />shows an estimated first year cost of $2.09 million including land, equipment, labor and <br />maintenance. Annual costs including an eight year amortization would be about $650,000. <br />The cost per ton estimate is increased from $53.00 per ton to about $56 per ton, assuming one- <br />third of incoming materials can be recycled, including wood, metal, drywall and reusables. This <br />does not include the heavy construction debris of rock, block, brick and concrete that could be <br />used as aggregate in road construction because the crushed mixed inert loads won't passs <br />NCDOT compaction regulations and the cost of locally available rock is currently too low to <br />make crushing the inert fraction a worthwhile endeavor. Inert debris is much cheaper to landfill. <br />If this material becomes marketable, the percentage recyclable could increase to an estimated <br />70 %. <br />Key issues: <br />Siting, designing, building and operating such a facility is a major undertaking. Most facilities <br />investigated take in far more than the 30,000 tons per year of C &D we average. Many restrict <br />materials to exclude the heterogeneous mix with accept to landfill now. <br />Cost: <br />Processing facilities are capital and equipment intensive. They can also employ a significant <br />amount of manual labor to hand -pick materials, high grade metal loads and perform the many <br />other tasks associated with such a maintenance - intensive operation. A more detailed, updated <br />cost estimate could be provided if the Board were interested in this approach to managing C &D. <br />D. Differential Fees/Bans <br />It is certainly feasible to extend the current set of differential fees and bans at the landfill to <br />include a greater variety of materials than the yard waste and corrugated cardboard now banned <br />from landfilling. Similar bans /penalties could be extended to include regulation of haulers and <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.