Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 11:21:40 AM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:32:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/9/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991109
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
where it is disposed. Further, disposal at sites other than a local site simply shifts the location but <br />does not contribute to waste reduction. <br />Mandatory source - separation of multiple C &D materials is not practiced anywhere in North <br />Carolina. The only places in the country we are aware of now requiring source separation of <br />construction and demolition wastes are Portland Oregon and Passaic New Jersey. Any strategy <br />based on policing of C &D waste to ensure proper separation for recycling or reuse, would <br />require significant enforcement infrastructure. <br />Key Issues: <br />This is the simplest aspect of regulatory measures to implement as we have control over the <br />existing C &D landfill. The Board of Commissioners could enact disposal bans or additional fees <br />for improperly separated loads. Too rigorous a set of enforcement regulations could result in <br />illegal dumping, loss of revenue from materials going to other facilities or numerous conflicts <br />over tolerance levels for "banned" materials. e.g. "How much wood is too much mixed in a load <br />where clean construction wood was "banned ?" <br />Costs: <br />We believe that if bans or differential fees were implemented, we would be obligated to provide <br />alternative management facilities and techniques for the source - separated materials. Those <br />facilities would require staff and capital investments to be effective. <br />C. Processing and Sorting <br />Construction and demolition materials may be source - separated as result of regulation, economic <br />incentives and disincentives, or desire of construction and demolition contractors to conform to <br />environmentally sound practices. Separated materials are typically delivered to a processing site. <br />Even when source - separated, additional handling and processing are required before such materials <br />are marketable. <br />C &D materials may also be mixed together at the work site and delivered to a disposal or recycling <br />facility and disposed or separated there. Typically, it is less expensive and more efficient to <br />processing and recycling operations at a disposal site to eliminate need to further handle and <br />transport residues and unrecyclable loads. <br />1. Source Separation <br />Under either the source - separated or mixed debris processing scenario, there are expenses <br />associated with sorting and processing materials for markets. It is typically simpler and less <br />expensive to manage source - separated materials than mixed materials received at a recycling site <br />because the sorting costs have been " shifted" upstream to the generator or hauler. <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.